Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hugh & Ruth V Ross Charitable Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$331k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$454kArts & Culture$178kReligion$119kEducation$85kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$5kEnvironment$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $303k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$101,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC$101,000
JM KOHLER ARTS CENTER ENDOWMENT$101,000
SHEBOYGAN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$4,000
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION-BRIDGWAY HOUSE$4,000
SHEBOYGAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$4,000
MEAD PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,000
SAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC$4,000
UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN ARTS SCHOLAR$4,000
FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC$2,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL PROJECT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 13 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$685k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+59%

Still filing today

62%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $364k · revenue +7%
  • SP
    SHEBOYGAN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +482%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue +59%
  • SC
    SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheboygan County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote sheboygan county business development.

—
2
Sheboygan County Economic Development Corporation

The mission of the sheboygan county economic development corporation (scedc), a countywide private/public partnership, is to lead economic development efforts to improve the economic well-being and long-term prosperity of the businesses,…

—
3
Lake Country Academy Inc

The mission of lake country academy is to be a recognized leader in education through direct instruction and core knowledge within an environment that emphasizes core values.

Education
4
Sheboygan Area Credit Union

Our mission is to provide efficient, progressive financial services and products to our owner-members in agreement with credit union philosophy

—
5
Sheboygan County Chamber Foundation Inc

Provide educational development programs in sheboygan county

Arts & Culture
6
Lakewood Theatre Company

To inspire and nurture a love of theatre and the arts with the following mission: the maintenance of a permanent multi-arts and theatre facility. the sponsorship and coordination of education and cultural programming in visual arts,…

Arts & Culture
7
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
8
Family Service Association of Sheboygan Inc

Family service association of sheboygan, inc. is dedicated to helping individuals and families maintain and achieve financial stability and improve their quality of life. we accomplish this and enhance the community by providing education,…

Human Services
9
Lake Superior Community Partnership Inc

To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.

—
10
Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc

Mission statement: to gather, grow, and give endowed charitable financial resources to build stronger, more vibrant communities now and into the future.value statement:we are committed to managing our clients' philanthropic endowments in…

Philanthropy
11
Environmental Park Trust of Sheboygan County

The promotion, development and maintenance of the ellwood h. may environmental park and its programs. the environmental park trust of sheboygan county was created to provide funding for the ellwood h. may environmental park developed to be…

—
12
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheboygan Public Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Theater for Young Audiences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $363,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INCLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $90,000 · HealthLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INCJM KOHLER ARTS CENTER ENDOWMENT: $107,500 · OtherJM KOHLER ARTS CENTER EN…CITY OF SHEBOYGAN: $29,000 · OtherCITY OF SHEBOYGANUNIVERSITY WISCONSIN ARTS SCHOLAR: $29,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY WISCONSIN ART…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL PROJECT: $13,250 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER O…+6 more: $11,250 · Other+6 moreFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT TRUST: $101,000 · ReligionFIRST CONGREGAT…SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 · ReligionSHEBOYGAN COUNT…SAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesSHEBOYGAN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · EducationLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationSHEBOYGAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $28,250 · Arts & CultureTHEATER FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionGLACIAL LAKES CONSERVANCY INC: $1,500 · Environment
Health$453,500Other$190,000Religion$119,000Human Services$43,500Education$42,500Arts & Culture$34,250Food & Nutrition$3,000Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $363,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT TRUST: $101,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $90,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHEBOYGAN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $29,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSHEBOYGAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $28,250 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHEATER FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES: $6,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEBOYGAN THEATRE COMPANY: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATER FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds GLACIAL LAKES CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Zieve Foundation · Kohler Foundation Inc · Hayssen Family Foundation Inc · Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc · Randall J & Judith F Hake Family Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Garton Family Foundation · Grover Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Sheboygan County Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hugh & Ruth V Ross Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hugh & Ruth V Ross Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hugh & Ruth V Ross Charitable Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hugh & Ruth V Ross Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hugh & Ruth V Ross’ filings →

    More from the funding graph