Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Huddle Up for Kids Foundation

The HUDDLE UP FOR KIDS FOUNDATION is a non-profit organization focused on its mission of building better tomorrows for kids.

$13k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Recreation & Sports$260kHealth$215kYouth Development$153kPhilanthropy$110kEducation$75kHuman Services$42kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $43k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$623k · 5 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$623k
$382k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+44%

Still filing today

80%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $260k · revenue +73%
  • WF
    WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +62%
  • OU
    OTHERS UNDER 10000 EACH
    4× · 2018–2021 · $133k

Funded once

  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $153k · revenue +44%
  • TJ
    THE JOE NAMATH CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +202%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

3
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
4
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
5
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
Shadyside Hospital of Pittsburgh
8
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
9
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
10
Upmc Hanover

Upmc hanover is a not-for-profit community hospital which is dedicated to the promotion of wellness, preservation of health, and the provision of diagnostic and therapeutic services to the people of the greater hanover area which…

Health
11
Upmc Center for High-Value Healthcare

Upmc center for high-value health care ein: 45-2178782 fiscal year ending june 30, 2025 form 990, part iii, statement of program service accomplishments upmc center for high-value health care (the center) was formed on may 4, 2011, as a…

Health
12
Pennsylvania Polio Survivors Network
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is HM3 Partners Independence Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $260,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INCOTHERS UNDER 10000 EACH — $133,153 · OtherOTHERS UNDER 10000 EACHBeaver County Cancer and Heart Association Inc — $35,550 · OtherBeaver County Cancer and Heart Association IncSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP — $32,300 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPALLIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $30,000 · OtherALLIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT+3 more — $36,242 · Other+3 moreWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $159,500 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FOUNDAT…Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc — $153,000 · Crime & LegalBig Brothers Big …THE JOE NAMATH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JOE NAMA…HM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyHM3 PARTNERS…Beaver County Educational Trust — $35,000 · EducationUPMC — $20,000 · Health
Other$527,245Human Services$159,500Crime & Legal$153,000Philanthropy$110,000Education$35,000Health$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $260,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $159,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc — $153,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetBeaver County Cancer and Heart Association Inc — $35,550 over 2y, 14% of budgetBeaver County Educational Trust — $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetUPMC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC Chapter 862 Southwest PA — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Upmc Group · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Huddle Up for Kids Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Huddle Up for Kids Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Huddle Up for Kids Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph