Skip to content
Huberfeld Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Huberfeld Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$730k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$12MEducation$2.2MHealth$646kHuman Services$447kPhilanthropy$120kInternational$33kFood & Nutrition$11kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k67 grants · $226k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $281k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $991k
  • $250k+1 grant · $730k
$3,600
Median grant
17
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT$730,000
THE BAL HARBOUR SHUL$220,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHIFRA$199,000
ARONI & CHANI PARNES FOUNDATION$150,000
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$130,000
MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM$100,000
MIKVEH YISROEL$100,000
CONG BAIS AVRAHOM ZEV$91,600
Individual grant recipient$35,000
CONG KOLLEL BNEI YESUAN$30,000
KEREN HASHLUCHIM$25,000
ZAKA$25,000
ASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ALEPH INSTITUTE$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $466k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHIFRA: $199k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $14k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5k → 11%JEWISH LATIN CENTER: $3k → 17%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $50k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $18k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $13k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 6%ANI LEDODI: $4k → 6%ANI LEDODI: $1k → 6%BETH OLOTH: $4k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $32k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 20%BELEV ECHAD: $10k → 20%FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $10k → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $9k → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $5k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 20%FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 58 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
217

Total granted

$10M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+18%

Still filing today

33%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $809k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +108%
  • OC
    Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $112k · revenue +64%
  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $86k · revenue +316%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MARCOS AND ADINA KATZ FAMILY FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M
  • CB
    CONG BAIS SHALOM
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • TE
    TAG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Harabbanim L'inyanei Tzeduka Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Light Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 342 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/59
Grantees still filing
35/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $2,510,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCTHE MARCOS AND ADINA KATZ FAMILY FUND: $1,100,000 · OtherTHE MARCOS AND ADINA KATZ FAMILY FUNDYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $1,070,600 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAHCONGREGATION BAIS AVRAHOM ZEV: $655,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS AVRAHOM ZEVMIKVAH YISROEL: $600,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER: $546,200 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL: $520,000 · Other+160 more: $4,510,481 · Other+160 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $1,930,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS…FRIENDS OF ZO ARTZEINU INC DBA THE JEWISH LEADERSHIP MOVEMENT/MANHIGUT YEHU: $150,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF ZO AR…BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $85,000 · Education+2 more: $13,600 · EducationAmerican Friends of Shifra Inc: $199,000 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $112,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $85,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $19,000 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $15,400 · Human Services+3 more: $26,400 · Human ServicesNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $174,000 · ReligionMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $100,000 · ReligionJERUSALEM CHESED-CHASDEI HENNY: $18,600 · ReligionCHABAD LUBAVITCH MITZVAH TANK: $18,000 · ReligionYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $15,000 · Religion+7 more: $40,900 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Orthodox Womens Medical Association Inc: $12,500 · PhilanthropyKeren Acheinu Bnei Yisroel Inc: $12,500 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,400 · PhilanthropyTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $72,100 · Crime & LegalCHAI LIFELINE INC: $25,950 · HealthAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $18,000 · Health
Other$11,512,281Education$2,178,600Human Services$457,300Religion$366,500Philanthropy$153,400Crime & Legal$72,100Health$43,950

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $1,930,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Shifra Inc: $199,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $174,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $112,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $85,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $85,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $72,100 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $25,950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJERUSALEM CHESED-CHASDEI HENNY: $18,600 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH MITZVAH TANK: $18,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $15,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJewish Orthodox Womens Medical Association Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKeren Acheinu Bnei Yisroel Inc: $12,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $11,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OLD CITY CHEDER IN JERUSALEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICA'S VOICES IN ISRAEL: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCAMP MORASHA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $6,800 over 2y, 24% of budgetEZER MIZION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREBBE TALMID INC KLEIN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOZAR HATORAH INC: $4,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAni Ledodi Inc: $4,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAPID YESHIVA INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Shifra Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ZO ARTZEINU INC DBA THE JEWISH LEADERSHIP MOVEMENT/MANHIGUT YEHU ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…Alyad Foundation IncBarber Family Foundat…Astar Foundation IncThe Ezra Charitable T…Zichron Yechiel Meche…Bracha Vehatzlacha Fo…The Ganger Foundation…Bcg Charitable Founda…Maalot
The Ojc FundNY40.4× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Alyad Foundation Inc · Barber Family Foundation · Astar Foundation Inc · The Ezra Charitable Trust · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · The Ganger Foundation Inc · Bcg Charitable Foundation · Maalot

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huberfeld Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huberfeld Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Huberfeld Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Huberfeld Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 342 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Huberfeld Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home