· Public charity
Hsu Family Educational Foundation Inc
The stated mission of hsu family educational foundation, inc (corporation) is to promote excellence in education and encourage classroom innovation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k17 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EGLIN CHAPTER AFA AEF | $22,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| AUVSI | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MISCELLANEOUS | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS | $1,284 |
| CHOCTAWHATCHEE HIGH - MU ALPHA THETA | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| RUCKEL MIDDLE SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +143% since the first grant, against +62% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ILINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +36%
- ECEMERALD COAST SCIENCE CENTER INC4× · 2018–2022 · $11k · revenue +143%
- DIDEFENSEWERX INC2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +363%
Funded once
- ECEMERALD COAST ROBOTICS ALLIANCE INCone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -69%
- OPOKALOOSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +149%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Innovation charter school empowers young ones for success as world changers through highly talented teachers using innovative and leading methods in a very loving environment.
Provide knowledge about the private enterprise system to local education systems.
Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.
Education of grades pre-school through eighth grade.
California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…
Public Education.
The institute for latino progress provides services that contribute to the fullest development of latino immigrants and their families through education, training, and employment that fosters full participation in society while preserving…
The illinois network of charter schools (incs) advocates for the improvement of public education by leveraging the charter school model as a catalyst to transform lives and communities.
To educate responsible citizen scholars for success in the college of their choice and a life of active citizenship.
is a not-for-profit organization designed to deliver practical, relevant and essential professional development for today's school leaders. The intent of the various programs is to provide standards-based, results-driven leadership…
The foundation of the palm beach day academy's program is the education of our students in an academically challenging and compassion rich environment that guides each child toward personal excellence of mind, body and character.
Accrediting independent schools.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emerald Coast Science Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is United for a Good Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMERALD COAST SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DEFENSEWERX INC ↗
- Who funds EMERALD COAST ROBOTICS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds OKALOOSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INC ↗
- Who funds EMERALD COAST CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gulf Power Foundationinc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hsu Family Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Defensewerx Inc — 100% of income from government
- Emerald Coast Crime Stoppers Inc — 81% of income from government
- Liza Jackson Preparatory School Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.