Skip to content
Hrp Impact Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hrp Impact Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,143
Median grant
1
States reached
$121k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTWICK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,143
TASKER STREET BAPTIST CHURCH COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION$7,143
RESIDENT ACTION COMMITTEE II$7,143
PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION$7,143
EMPOWERED CDC INC$7,143
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$7,143
EASTWICK FRIENDS & NEIGHBORS COALITION$7,143
JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION$7,143
GRAYS FERRY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC$7,143
AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA$7,143
FRIENDS OF THE CHAPEL OF FOUR CHAPLAINS$7,143
UNIVERSAL AUDENRIED PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL$7,142
PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION$7,142
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7k → 22%EMPOWERED CDC INC: $7k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESIDENT ACTION COMMITTEE II: $7,143 · OtherRESIDENT ACTION COMMITTEE IITASKER STREET BAPTIST CHURCH COMMUN ITY OUTREACH CORPORATION: $7,143 · OtherTASKER STREET BAPTIST CHURCH COMMUN ITY OUTREACH CORPORATIONFRIENDS OF THE CHAPEL OF FOUR CHAPLAINS INC: $7,143 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHAPEL OF FOUR CHAPLAINS INCEASTWICK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,143 · OtherEASTWICK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHGRAYS FERRY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $7,143 · OtherGRAYS FERRY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INCTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION: $7,143 · OtherTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSAL AUDENRIED PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,142 · OtherUNIVERSAL AUDENRIED PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP CHARTER …PACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $14,285 · Community ImprovementPACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIAT…EASTWICK FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS COAL: $7,143 · Community ImprovementEASTWICK FRIENDS AND NEIGH…EMPOWERED CDC INC: $7,143 · Human ServicesEMPOWERED CDC INCSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $7,143 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST COMMUNI…AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA: $7,143 · Arts & Culture
Other$50,000Community Improvement$21,428Human Services$14,286Arts & Culture$7,143

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACKER PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $14,285 over 1y, 33% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHAPEL OF FOUR CHAPLAINS INC: $7,143 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $7,143 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION: $7,143 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hrp Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home