Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard P Meyer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$64kCommunity Improvement$40kHealth$35kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$32kYouth Development$30kHuman Services$22kAnimals$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$974k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Imperial Valley Food Bank$15,000
Cody's Closet$15,000
Pioneers Museum$15,000
El Centro PAL$10,000
IV Desert Museum$5,000
Neighborhood House of Calexico$5,000
Best Step Forward$5,000
Cancer Research of the Desert$5,000
Boys Girls Club of Imp Valley$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%American Red Cross: $10k → 21%American Red Cross: $2k → 21%Best Step Forward: $5k → 21%Best Step Forward: $5k → 21%Lifted Up Living: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 14 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$248k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+45%

Still filing today

36%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IV
    IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK
    5× · 2019–2024 · $32k · revenue +38%
  • IV
    Imperial Valley College Foundation
    4× · 2019–2022 · $29k · revenue +99%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IV
    Imperial Valley Humane Society
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IR
    IMPERIAL REGIONAL ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +93%
  • IC
    Imperial County Office of Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imperial Valley Wellness Foundation

IVWF partners with local non-profit organizations to address pressing health issues for Imperial County's most vulnerable populations. IVWF provides funding for efforts addressing healthy eating, active living: community prevention linked…

Health
2
Inland Empire Rescue Mission Inc

Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire

—
3
Irwindale Educational Foundation
—
4
Inland Empire Harm Reduction

Inland empire harm reduction is a community-based public health organization working to improve the health and well-being of people affected by drug use in the inland empire region of riverside and san bernardino counties.

Public Benefit
5
Imperial Valley Community Foundation

To Champion local philanthropy to benefit the Imperial Valley community by helping donors fulfill their philanthropic goals while preserving enduring charitable assets forever.

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Imperial County

The United Way of Imperial County raises money in Imperial County from People in the work place, businesses, and individuals to help support agencies that serve the community.

Philanthropy
7
Inland Valleys Association of Realtors

The core purpose of IVAR is to help its members become more professional and profitable, while promoting and protecting real property rights.

Membership Benefit
8
San Bernardino Riverside Counties Union Services

The inland empire labor institute connects unions to community-based organization resources to develop an inclusive and sustainable economic development ecosystem in california.

—
9
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
10
Immigrants Charitable Foundation Dba La Community Aid

LA Community Aid (LACA) empowers socially and economically oppressed members of greater Los Angeles by equipping them with tools to overcome job insecurity, food insecurity, and houselessness. In doing so, we enable our community not…

Human Services
11
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
12
Diaper Bank of the Inland Empire

The Diaper Bank of the Inland Empire provided essential diapering supplies to low-income families across the Inland Empire.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Imperial County Office of Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pioneers Museum: $37,000 · OtherPioneers MuseumIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $31,500 · OtherIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANKCancer Research of the Desert: $27,000 · OtherCancer Research of the DesertIV Desert Museum: $25,000 · OtherIV Desert MuseumCODYS CLOSET: $25,000 · OtherCODYS CLOSETImperial Valley Humane Society: $20,000 · OtherImperial Valley Humane SocietyBoys Girls Club of Imp Valley: $15,000 · OtherBoys Girls Club of Imp ValleyEl Centro PAL: $15,000 · OtherEl Centro PAL+11 more: $27,200 · Other+11 moreImperial Valley College Foundation: $29,000 · EducationImperial Val…Imperial County Office of Education Foundation: $5,000 · EducationImperial Cou…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…BEST STEP FORWARD: $10,000 · Human ServicesBEST STEP …LIFTED UP LIVING INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFTED UP …Neighborhood House of Calexico: $15,000 · Community ImprovementIMPERIAL REGIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementDEES RESCUE INC: $1,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$222,700Education$34,000Human Services$27,000Community Improvement$20,000Animals$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $31,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetImperial Valley College Foundation: $29,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetNeighborhood House of Calexico: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST STEP FORWARD: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetIMPERIAL REGIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetImperial County Office of Education Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLIFTED UP LIVING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetDEES RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Imperial Valley College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House of Calexico ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BEST STEP FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL REGIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Imperial County Office of Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LIFTED UP LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds DEES RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard P Meyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard P Meyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard P Meyer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph