Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard and Tracy Ankin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0158% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$40kArts & Culture$39kReligion$28kHealth$16kEducation$15kInternational$11kCivil Rights$10kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$470k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$124,954
JUF$41,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$5,000
FRACIS W PARKER SCHOOL$3,000
CURES WITHIN REACH$3,000
EZRA HABONIM THE NILES TOWNSHIP$600
ROLFE PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $18k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL: $5k → 14%FRANCIS W PARKER: $100k → 14%UIL LAW: $5k → 19%YAD VASHEM: $4k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL: $5k → 14%FRANCIS W PARKER: $8k → 14%UIL LAW: $5k → 19%YAD VASHEM: $2k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL: $5k → 14%FRACIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $6k → 14%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM: $2k → 17%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $5k → 14%FRANCIS W PARKER: $5k → 14%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $5k → 14%FRANCIS W PARKER: $5k → 14%FRACIS W PARKER SCHOOL: $3k → 14%AIPAC: $10k → 14%CHICAGO VOLUNTEERS LEGAL SERVICES: $15k → 14%CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES: $10k → 14%THE DECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS: $5k → 14%THE DECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS: $5k → 14%CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEAGUE SERVICES: $4k → 14%CURES WITHIN REACH: $3k → 14%JEWISH JUDGES ASS OF ILLINOIS: $2k → 14%CHICAGO WHITE SOX: $6k → 14%ANSHE EMET: $125k → 14%BERNARD ZELL ANSHE ENCT D: $25k → 14%ANSHE EMET: $18k → 14%BERNARD ZELL: $16k → 14%BERNARD ZELL: $15k → 14%ANSHE EMET: $12k → 14%ANSHE EMET: $12k → 14%ANSHE EMET: $10k → 14%BERNARD ZELL: $10k → 14%BERNARD ZELL: $5k → 14%SHOMRIM SOCIETY: $2k → 14%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1k → 14%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%JUF: $41k → 14%JUF: $11k → 14%JUF: $11k → 14%JUF: $11k → 14%JUF: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $6k → 14%UNVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO LAW: $3k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$526k · 15 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$526k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+66%

Still filing today

40%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +19%
  • DS
    DECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +122%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BZ
    BERNARD ZELL ANSHE ENCT D
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • CV
    CHICAGO VOLUNTEERS LEGAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • A
    AIPAC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
3
Yad Vashem Usa Foundation

Yad vashem usa foundation (the organization) is dedicated to support the memorialization and awareness of, and education regarding, the holocaust, as currently overseen, supervised and conducted by yad vashem, the holocaust martyrs and…

Arts & Culture
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
American Society for Holocaust Education and Remembrance Inc

To impart the memory and enduring lessons of the holocaust, applying them in ways that relate to a changing world and the challenges that we face in the fight against antisemitism, racism, and hatred.

Arts & Culture
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
American Jewish Historical Society

See schedule o - the american jewish historical society (the "society") is the oldest ethnic, cultural archive in the united states. the society provides access to more than 30 million documents and 50,000 books, photographs, art and…

Arts & Culture
10
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy
11
Fellowships At Auschwitz for the Study of Professional Ethics Inc

Faspe challenges graduate students and future leaders to recognize and confront their ethical responsibilities as professionals by analyzing the decisions and actions of nazi-era professionals.

International
12
St Louis Kaplan Feldman Holocaust Museum

The museum provides exhibition experiences and educational programming that connects visitors to the history and lessons of the holocaust with the goal of combating hatred, promoting understanding, and modeling and inspiring humanitarian…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holocaust Memorial Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $176,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $117,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUF: $80,000 · OtherJUFIndividual grant recipient: $46,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBERNARD ZELL ANSHE ENCT D: $25,000 · Other+25 more: $116,950 · Other+25 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $19,800 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · InternationalFrancis W Parker School: $9,000 · EducationMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$562,204Arts & Culture$38,800International$11,000Education$9,000Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $19,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $10,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS: $10,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DECALOGUE SOCIETY OF LAWYERS ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard and Tracy Ankin Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard and Tracy Ankin Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard and Tracy Ankin Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard and Tracy Ankin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard and Tracy Ankin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph