Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hortulani Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.0MYouth Development$1.0MReligion$602kArts & Culture$180kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$25kHealth$15k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF THE ROSES: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 6 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +58% · 34% of their budget
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2023 · $831k · revenue +55%
  • L
    LANCASTERHISTORYORG
    3× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • FT
    FULTON THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -1%
  • LP
    LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • CM
    CENTRAL MARKET TRUST
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…

2
Lancaster Emergency Medical Services Association

To provide comprehensive, skillful, cost effective emergency and non- emergency health care services to the lancaster community while continuing to evolve with changing health care needs.

Health
3
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
4
Lancaster Science Center

To inspire curiosity, creativity, and confidence by fostering an inclusive environment for hands-on stem exploration. we actively seek to make our facility and educational programs accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
5
Lancaster County Community Foundation

We embolden extraordinary community by investing in people and ideas that will shape the future of lancaster county.

Philanthropy
6
Lancaster General Health

Provides managerial and financial support to its controlled organizations and is also responsible for undertaking activities designed to advance the general health of the community.

Health
7
Central Penn Business Group On Health

Central business group on health advocates for the appropriate balance between cost and quality of employee healthcare in lancaster county by providing education on healthcare issues, promoting cooperation among payers, providers and…

8
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
9
Library System of Lancaster County

Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the member libraries in order to effectively serve our communities

10
The New School of Lancaster Dba New School Montessori

The mission is to facilitate the unfolding of each child's unique potential through an outstanding montessori education that enables a child to meet future challenges, and that encourages a love of learning, independent thinking, social…

11
Lancaster County Foundation

To support the activities and programs of the lancaster county community foundation, whose mission is "to embolden extraordinary community by investing in people and ideas that will shape the future of lancaster county."

Human Services
12
Lancaster County Council of the Arts

To enrich the quality of life in Lancaster County by building vibrant and inclusive communities connecting arts, culture, education, and economic vitality.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Country Day School and the most unlike its peers is The Children Deserve a Chance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATI…LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $830,600 · EducationLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY — $49,700 · EducationLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARYST JAMES EPISOCPAL CHURCH — $322,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISOCPAL CHURCHST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $280,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCHWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $160,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY+2 more — $32,500 · OtherLANCASTERHISTORYORG — $130,000 · Arts & CultureFULTON THEATRE COMPANY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER COMMUNITY SAFETY COALITION — $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLANCASTER TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT — $13,366 · Public Safety & DisasterYMCA OF THE ROSES — $24,845 · Human ServicesCHOICES HEALTHCARE — $7,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,000,000Education$880,300Other$794,500Arts & Culture$180,000Public Safety & Disaster$33,366Human Services$32,345

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $830,600 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetLANCASTERHISTORYORG — $130,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetFULTON THEATRE COMPANY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY — $49,700 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRAL MARKET TRUST — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES — $24,845 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLANCASTER COMMUNITY SAFETY COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLANCASTER TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT — $13,366 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHOICES HEALTHCARE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Dodge Family Foundation · Thomas a and Georgina T Russo Foundation · Fulton Family Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Paul and Marian Gerhart Charitable Fund · Tecumseh Milestone Foundation · Gooding Group Foundation · The Steinman Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hortulani Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph