Skip to content
Hortley G Leblang Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hortley G Leblang Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
100
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$146kHealth$125kInternational$52kFood & Nutrition$31kCivil Rights$29kHuman Services$29kArts & Culture$20kEducation$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHESED 247 - BIKUR CHOLIM OF ROCKLA$6,500
EFRAT EMERGENCY MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
YESHIVA HAR TORAH$2,706
NATIONAL COUNCIL JEWISH WOMEN$2,000
FOOD BANK OF THE HUDSON VALLEY$1,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
KEHILLAS BAIS YEHUDAH$1,500
MAZON$1,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,500
BIKE 4 CHAI$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN$1,000
HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $360 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $360 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $500 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $500 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $500 → 11%OORAH: $250 → 11%OORAH: $250 → 11%OORAH: $250 → 11%JCC OF ROCKLAND: $500 → 14%OORAH: $250 → 11%A-TIME: $580 → 20%A-TIME: $540 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%KOSHER TROOPS: $500 → 14%MISASKIM: $750 → 20%KOSHER TROOPS: $500 → 14%A TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $750 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%A-TIME: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $440 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%DOROT: $500 → 17%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $420 → 14%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $390 → 14%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $360 → 14%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $360 → 14%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $360 → 14%LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $360 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 127 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

127 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

127
24

Total granted

$513k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+5%

Still filing today

48%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • YH
    YESHIVA HAR TORAH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +90%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    6× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROCKLAND CHESED NETWORK TOMCHE SHAB
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JO
    JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • IC
    ISARAEL CHAI MAGEN FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
8
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
9
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
10
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
11
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
12
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Giving Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/77
Grantees still filing
58/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND: $27,000 · OtherTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLANDYESHIVA HAR TORAH: $21,019 · OtherYESHIVA HAR TORAHKEHILLAS BAIS YEHUDAH: $14,000 · Other+113 more: $306,996 · Other+113 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $13,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATI…Central Fund of Israel: $11,800 · InternationalCentral Fun…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $6,550 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…THE GESHER FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · InternationalTHE GESHER …EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,400 · InternationalEMUNAH OF A…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $4,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…JUST ONE LIFE INC: $3,890 · InternationalJUST ONE LI…AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $2,500 · InternationalEZER MIZION: $2,250 · InternationalAMIT CHILDREN INC: $2,000 · International+2 more: $1,610 · InternationalCancer Care Inc: $9,000 · HealthCancer Care…AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $9,000 · HealthAMERICAN PA…American Heart Association Inc: $9,000 · HealthAmerican He…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $7,000 · HealthNATIONAL MU…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,014 · HealthAMERICAN CA…CHAI LIFELINE INC: $4,500 · HealthCHAI LIFELI…Sharsheret Inc: $4,200 · HealthSharsheret …PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S…+3 more: $2,070 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $24,500 · Community ImprovementMISASKIM CORP: $5,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $3,880 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,640 · Human ServicesKOSHER TROOPS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT INC: $2,250 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1,000 · Human Services+4 more: $1,900 · Human ServicesUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,850 · PhilanthropyFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyJust One Chesed Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $750 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN GIVING INC: $750 · PhilanthropyTHE 100 RIDE INC: $600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $7,750 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$369,015International$57,000Health$53,784Community Improvement$24,500Human Services$22,670Philanthropy$13,200Food & Nutrition$10,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $24,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH: $21,019 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $11,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $7,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $6,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,014 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $4,640 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNoam Shabbos Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GESHER FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $4,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $3,890 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $3,880 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,640 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEAST COAST GREENWAY ALLIANCE INC: $2,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKOSHER TROOPS INC: $2,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frisch School: $1,384 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM & CENTER FOR TOLERANCE AND EDUCATION: $1,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOARING SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP DORA GOLDING: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $1,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $1,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HAR TORAH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundMutual of America Fou…Gertrude and Morris B…Cross River Community…United Jewish Appeal-…FjcGranit FoundationRuth R Greenberg Fami…Cd FoundationThe Arthur & Joyce Fe…Dinim Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY28.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Mutual of America Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Fjc · Granit Foundation · Ruth R Greenberg Family Foundation · Cd Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Dinim Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hortley G Leblang Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hortley G Leblang Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hortley G Leblang’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home