Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hornish Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$70kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$30kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
MOBILE MEALS$6,000
GREENVILLE AREA PARKINSON SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HealthNetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Let There Be Mom: $5k → 10%HealthNetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%HealthNetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%Health Network Foundation: $10k → 17%Health Network Foundation: $10k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%Healthnetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%HealthNetwork Foundation: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 3 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +329% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$126k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+329%
+55%

Still filing today

33%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsReligionFood & NutritionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +329%
  • MM
    MOBILE MEALS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k
  • TI
    TEACHBEYOND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k

Funded once

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +94%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +52%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peace and Paws

Charitable dog and pet rescue that focuses on dogs that require significantly more medical and behavioral care than average dogs.

—
2
Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc

Loaves & fishes provides nourishing food with respect and dignity to all who seek assistance, while offering robust opportunities for community engagement through volunteerism, partnerships, and nutrition education.

Food & Nutrition
3
Loaves and Fishes New Haven Inc

Loaves and fishes shares god's love by providing food, clothing, and community to our neighbors in a safe and welcoming space. we advocate for a more equitable and just food system in greater new haven. we provide food, clothing and access…

Food & Nutrition
4
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
5
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
6
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
7
Let Love Live

Let love live's mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need, ensuring they receive the love, care, and respect they deserve.

Animals
8
Great Pyrs & Paws Rescue

Great pyrs & paws rescue is a 501c3 organization with a network of volunteers across the united states. we rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome unwanted, displaced, and neglected great pyrenees along with other livestock guardian dogs that are…

Animals
9
Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc

The mission of hsl hospice is to provide exceptional care to terminally ill patients and their families allowing patients to attain the highest quality of life possible. hsl hospice aims to provide the highest quality hospice service that…

Human Services
10
Lungevity Foundation Inc

Lungevity's vision is a world where no one dies of lung cancer. lungevity foundation is firmly committed to making an immediate impact on increasing quality-of-life and survivorship of people with lung cancer by accelerating research into…

Health
11
Healthcare for the Homeless-Houston

Non-profit corporation providing healthcare to the homeless.

Human Services
12
Halo Helping Animals Live On Inc

Dog and cat rescue and rehousing; humane care and treatment of these animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Greenville Area Parkinsons Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATIO…LET THERE BE MOM INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLET THERE BE MOM INCMOBILE MEALS: $26,000 · OtherMOBILE MEALSTEACHBEYOND INC: $20,000 · OtherTEACHBEYOND INCSalvation Army Operation Blue Santa: $5,000 · OtherSalvation Army Operation Blue S…Operation John 315: $2,500 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10,000 · ReligionGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLOAVES AND FISHES: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF PARKERSBURG: $5,000 · AnimalsSAFE IN AUSTIN RESCUE RANCH: $5,000 · AnimalsGreenville Area Parkinsons Society: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$85,000Other$53,500Religion$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$10,000Animals$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PARKERSBURG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGreenville Area Parkinsons Society: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLET THERE BE MOM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE IN AUSTIN RESCUE RANCH: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hornish Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hornish Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hornish Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph