Skip to content
Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$19MHealth$11MPhilanthropy$4.0MInternational$3.0MHuman Services$590kEnvironment$570kArts & Culture$464kYouth Development$280kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
  • $250k+7 grants · $8.0M
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$199M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$2,500,000
MAYO CLINIC$2,000,000
KUSP1 LLC$1,000,000
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC$965,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$540,790
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$519,697
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$477,700
NOTMYKID INC$150,000
BABY2BABY$150,000
BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CHILDHELP INC$50,000
UNITED STATES MARSHALS POSSE$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE$47,300
GALLATIN SHALOM ZONE$40,000
THE SALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$27,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SUPPORT FUND: $32k → 14%MISSION PROJECT INC: $1k → 5%LET IT BE US: $10k → 13%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SUPPORT FUND: $26k → 14%MISSION PROJECT INC: $1k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC: $150k → 15%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $1k → 7%CHILDHELP INC: $50k → 11%VALLEY GUARDIANS: $10k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOC OF CENTRAL KS INC: $5k → 13%VALLEY GUARDIANS: $10k → 11%BLESSED HOPE FAMILY INC: $5k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $10k → 11%NOTMYKID INC: $150k → 11%NOTMYKID INC: $25k → 11%NOTMYKID INC: $24k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOC OF CENTRAL KS INC: $3k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOC OF CENTRAL KS INC: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 76 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
93

Total granted

$30M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+6%

Still filing today

82%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    7× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +93%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $811k · revenue +53%
  • PG
    PHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $505k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    one grant, 2024 · $550k · revenue +2%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
  • TO
    THE OCEAN CLEANUP NORTH PACIFIC PROJECT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $135k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mosharrafa Plastic Surgery Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
138/141
Grantees still filing
93/141
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Kansas University Endowment Association: $15,500,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment AssociationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $810,790 · Education+18 more: $521,110 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $10,000,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICKUSP1 LLC: $1,000,000 · OtherKUSP1 LLCUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $550,000 · OtherPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $505,000 · Other+114 more: $2,543,576 · Other+114 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $3,032,827 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOU…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,559,853 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHA…+11 more: $569,700 · Philanthropy+11 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $971,100 · Community ImprovementGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $250,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $2,000 · Community ImprovementNOTMYKID: $198,800 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SUPPORT FUND: $57,500 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY GUARDIANS INC: $20,000 · Human Services+7 more: $49,000 · Human ServicesGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $404,600 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MISSOULA PARKS INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE SURF: $15,000 · EnvironmentMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $123,519 · Arts & CultureFRIST ART MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $47,300 · Arts & CultureBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $21,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $78,565 · Arts & Culture
Education$16,831,900Other$14,598,576Philanthropy$6,162,380Community Improvement$1,223,100Human Services$525,300Environment$444,600Arts & Culture$420,384

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $15,500,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $3,032,827 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,559,853 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $971,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $810,790 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $550,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $505,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $404,600 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $250,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetALPHA XI CHAPTER OF THE SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY: $230,000 over 3y, 67% of budgetNOTMYKID: $198,800 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBABY2BABY: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES: $130,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR - TENNESSEE CHAPTER: $127,800 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $123,519 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,396 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED STATES MARSHALS POSSE: $95,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetIMPACT THROUGH GOLF FOUNDATION: $86,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $77,800 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SUPPORT FUND: $57,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetASU PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $50,610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIST ART MUSEUM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSALINA SHARES INC: $48,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $47,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES: $44,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOSHARRAFA PLASTIC SURGERY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE H FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSALINA GRACE FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetLOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC: $28,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MISSOULA PARKS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Salina Commun…Salina Regional Healt…Smoot Charitable Foun…Mike Berkley Family F…Earl Bane FoundationMcCune & Middlekauff …Arizona Community Fou…Mildred and Rolland M…Walker Family Foundat…Milton I and Frances …Verla Nesbitt Joscely…Marshall Family Found…
Greater Salina Community FoundationKS41× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation · Salina Regional Health Foundation · Smoot Charitable Foundation · Mike Berkley Family Foundation Inc · Earl Bane Foundation · McCune & Middlekauff Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Mildred and Rolland Middlekauff Foundation · Walker Family Foundation · Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation · Verla Nesbitt Joscelyn Foundation · Marshall Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horejsi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home