Skip to content
Hope for New Haven Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hope for New Haven Inc

Provides childcare as well as after school tutorial and summer camp

$501k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MEducation$163kYouth Development$8kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $520k
$30,727
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER$82,000
MS MIA S TLC GROUP DAYCARE$75,379
SCHOLASTIC RENAISSANCE$64,729
WEST HAVEN CHILD DEV CENTER$62,097
GROWING UP TOGETHER DAYCARE$61,254
LIL SUNSHINE HOME DAY CARE$61,254
EVERY CHILD AHEAD$60,286
ATLAS TRAINING CENTER$52,800
ARMS OF LOVE ACADEMY INC$36,252
BABY ME DAY CARE$34,102
NOAH S ARK DAYCARE$30,727
HAVENLY$27,011
FRIENDS CENTER FOR CHILDREN$25,000
ACES - AREA COOPERATIVE EDUCATION$14,292
FIRST STEP LEARNING CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 10 repeat orgs$485k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$995k
$238k

Still filing today

10%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $246k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
EmploymentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MS MIA S TLC GROUP DAYCARE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $135k
  • SR
    SCHOLASTIC RENAISSANCE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $134k
  • LS
    LIL SUNSHINE HOME DAY CARE LLC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $133k

Funded once

  • IT
    IT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $87k
  • MG
    MORNING GLORY EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • HT
    HARRIS & TUCKER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MS MIA S TLC GROUP DAYCARE: $135,379 · OtherMS MIA S TLC GROUP DAYCARESCHOLASTIC RENAISSANCE: $134,194 · OtherSCHOLASTIC RENAISSANCELIL SUNSHINE HOME DAY CARE LLC: $132,991 · OtherLIL SUNSHINE HOME DAY CARE LLCEVERY CHILD AHEAD: $124,786 · OtherEVERY CHILD AHEADGROWING UP TOGETHER DAYCARE: $124,629 · OtherGROWING UP TOGETHER DAYCAREARMS OF LOVE FAMILY ACADEMY INC: $99,627 · OtherARMS OF LOVE FAMILY ACADEMY INCWEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $92,097 · OtherWEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCIT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $86,625 · OtherIT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTERIT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTER: $82,000 · OtherIT TAKES A VILLAGE LEARNING CENTERBABY ME DAY CARE: $75,210 · OtherNOAH'S ARK DAYCARE: $62,977 · OtherATLAS TRAINING CENTER: $52,800 · Other+19 more: $210,227 · Other+19 moreHAVENLY: $27,011 · EmploymentFRIENDS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesAREA COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: $14,292 · Education
Other$1,413,542Employment$27,011Human Services$25,000Education$14,292

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $92,097 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHAVENLY: $27,011 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAREA COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: $14,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVENLY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AREA COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Women's Business Deve…United Way of Greater…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater New HavenCT27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Women's Business Development Council Inc · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope for New Haven Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope for New Haven Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Havenly: 40% of income from government
  • Friends Center for Children Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Area Cooperative Educational Services: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hope for New Haven Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hope for New Haven Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope for New Haven’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home