· Public charity
Hope Enterprise Corporation
To strengthen the financial health of people in under-resourced deep south communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION | $200,000 |
| ALTCAP | $140,000 |
| PEOPLE TRUST | $140,000 |
| CANSECO PROPERTIES FILMORE LLC | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITITES UNLIMITED INC | $70,000 |
| CAPITAL CITY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION LLC | $14,246 |
| CUPCAKE CUTIE ETC LLC | $10,001 |
| SIGNATURE TRUSSEES LLC | $9,838 |
| TM HEALTH & FITNESS | $7,778 |
| THE BROLIN ROCHELLE BRAND | $7,274 |
| FOOD4THOUGHT CONSULTING LLC | $7,248 |
| LASHERYL COACHING AND COUNSELING | $6,888 |
| BEAS BAYOU USA LLC | $6,203 |
| TIME TO SPRING FORWARD LLC | $6,114 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHOPE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION6× · 2017–2024 · $5.0M
- MMARKETFARE3× · 2019–2021 · $300k
- CPCANSECO PROPERTIES FILMORE LLC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5.0M · revenue +565% · 83% of their budget
- PPOSIGENone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- JMJACKSON METRO SPONSORING COMMITTEE-WORKI D/B/A WORKING TOGETHER JACKSONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +73% · 96% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Acc capital is a private nonprofit financial leader on a mission for economic change. we are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs and uplifting communities with accessible loans, resources, and over 68 years of experience.
The organization is organized to address the common economic and business interests of the mississippi gulf coast by identifying issues, convening resources, framing public policy, finding solutions, and working to improve the business…
Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.
Mid-city redevelopment alliance is a chartered member of the neighborworks america network of excellence. the 250-member network operates using best practices that ensure strong business operations, organized and strategic data management,…
Improving the economic development opportunities of jackson county, mississippi by unifying planning, economic & industrial development, and marketing activities in the county.
To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.
Creating economic opportunities in distressed rural communities.
To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.
To bring economic development to its fullest potential, for job growth in jackson county, as well as develop a strong core of resources for the future.
Community LIFT Corporation (Community LIFT) is a non profit community development intermediary whose mission is to revitalize neighborhoods through strategic investment in the areas of human capacity-building and economic and community…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson Metro Sponsoring Committee-Worki D/B/a Working Together Jackson and the most unlike its peers is Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON METRO SPONSORING COMMITTEE-WORKI D/B/A WORKING TOGETHER JACKSON ↗
- Who funds We2gether Creating Change ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds ALTCAP ↗
- Who funds EAST ARKANSAS ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
- Who funds MARY REYNOLDS BABCOCK FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hope Enterprise Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.