Skip to content
Hope 4 All at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hope 4 All

To help create hope and opportunity in north texas by connecting, communicating, collaborating, and closing gaps in support of equity, education, the environment, and equine initiatives.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$118kRecreation & Sports$48kHousing & Shelter$40kHuman Services$23kEnvironment$10kAnimals$10kEducation$8k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $43,266, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,627 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,361 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$7,160
Median grant
1
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPS WITH HORSES$30,060
GRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITIES INC$7,160
CHILDREN FIRST INC$6,046
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $10k → 14%APPLE TREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION: $8k → 14%OLD FRIENDS INC: $10k → 8%KENTUCKY RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY: $10k → 9%RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA: $7k → 15%PLAYGRAND ADVENTURES: $10k → 14%KENTUCKY RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY: $6k → 9%RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA: $5k → 15%LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $11k → 14%KENTUCKY RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY: $5k → 9%GRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITIES INC: $10k → 14%KENTUCKY RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY: $5k → 9%GRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITIES INC: $7k → 14%LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $7k → 14%LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 6 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$218k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+113%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsReligionHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    STEPS WITH HORSES
    4× · 2019–2024 · $118k · revenue +377%
  • KR
    Kentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $26k · revenue +79%
  • LF
    LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $23k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXASgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +113%
  • OF
    Old Friends Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +148%
  • PA
    PLAYGRAND ADVENTURES
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gateway Horseworks

Gateway horseworks incorporates horses for the mental health treatment of people

Health
2
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
3
Heavens Gait Ranch Inc

Equine Activities under PATH International Building a compassionate community to challenge adversity to grow.

Recreation & Sports
4
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
5
Thoroughbred Charities of America Inc

TCA's mission is to fund and facilitate the support of Thoroughbreds and the people who care for them.

Animals
6
Prime Time

Seek to enrich the lives of families with children who are seriously ill or disabled by providing an outdoor wilderness experience where families can enjoy themselves in a supportive atmosphere without financial burden.

Health
7
Mcpaws Inc

Transforming lives by strengthening the human-animal connection.

Animals
8
The Children's Place Inc

Provide mental health services to promote resiliency, wellness and positive developmental outcomes through prevention, treatment, education and family support for children under the age of 9 who have experienced abuse, neglect and other…

Crime & Legal
9
Heavens Gait Therapeutic Riding Inc

Provide emotional, physical and social benefits to children and adults with special needs through a therapeuttic partnership with horses

Health
10
Special Equestrians Inc

Our Vision: A community where the impossible becomes possible. Our mission: To enrich the lives of people with physical, cognitive or emotional challenges through a relationship with a horse.

Human Services
11
Equine Land Conservation Resource

Access to and conservation of land for equine use

Environment
12
Hooves & Paws Rescue of the Heartland

Continue to provide rescues of horses,donkeys, and large dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Race Track Chaplaincy of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Playgrand Adventures. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPS WITH HORSES: $117,560 · HealthSTEPS WITH HORSESCHILDREN FIRST INC: $22,606 · OtherCHILDREN FIRST INCGRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITES INC: $17,160 · OtherGRAND PRAIRIE UNITED C…RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 · OtherRACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY …Kentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc: $25,500 · ReligionKentucky Ra…LIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterLIFELINE F…PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $10,000 · EnvironmentOld Friends Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsPLAYGRAND ADVENTURES: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAPPLETREE EARLY LEARNING PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,500 · Education
Health$117,560Other$51,766Religion$25,500Housing & Shelter$23,000Environment$10,000Animals$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPS WITH HORSES: $117,560 over 4y, 16% of budgetKentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc: $25,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetLIFELINE FOR FAMILIES INC: $23,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST INC: $22,606 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITES INC: $17,160 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAPPLETREE EARLY LEARNING PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Prairie Quality…The Loh FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Amazonsmile Foundation
Grand Prairie Quality of Life Foundation IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Prairie Quality of Life Foundation Inc · The Loh Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope 4 All funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope 4 All. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hope 4 All?

    Find your warmest path to Hope 4 All through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope 4 All’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home