Loading…
· Public charity
HOMELESS RESOURCE COUNCIL
To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.
$4.7M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants
1
Communities
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 15 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $405k
- $250k+6 grants · $4.2M
$90,904
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Foothill House of Hospitality$1,318,204
- Advocates for Mentally Ill Ho$1,107,363
- Stand Up Placer$740,143
- Placer County Adult System of$393,038
- The Gathering Inn$381,541
- Volunteers of America$309,388
- Connecting Point$93,672
- Sierra Roots$90,904
- Placer County Office of Educa$80,986
- FREED$80,000
- SPIRIT$59,372
- Nevada County Superintendent$34,967
- Bright Futures for Youth$30,000
- Nevada County$22,898
- Placer County Health and Huma$6,375
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Shasta Supportive Housing and Services
To provide affordable housing and supportive services to people experiencing homelessness, the frail elderly, and other vulnerable populations.
Housing & Shelter
2
Welcome Home Housing Inc
Welcome Home Housing is a non-profit organization in Sacramento California that provides affordable housing and services to individuals with mental illness.
Human Services
3
Seasons Housing
Seasons Housing is Sober Living Housing for those who are dealing with addiction issues. In addition to providing a safe living environment we also offer a variety of services to support our residents in their recovery journey. We have…
Housing & Shelter
4
Restfull Nights Organization Inc
Homeless Shelter for Adults with mental health
Human Services
5
Recovery Cafe San Jose
Recovery Cafe San Jose creates community that supports healing from trauma, addiction,homelessness, and mental health challenges. Our loving accountability empowers personal growth andsustains long-term recovery.
Human Services
6
Hollywood 4WRD
Hollywood 4WRD is a coalition driven to create systemic change to effectively address homelessness in Hollywood through advocacy, education, service coordination, and innovation
Community Improvement
7
Sacramento Cottage Housing Inc
Develop healing communities that are solution-focused, Participant-Driven and Strength-based, where homeless people help themselves - and each other - through their transition from the streets to self-sustainability.
Housing & Shelter
8
House of Hope
Assisting and housing females in recovery
—
9
Sunshine for Humanity Inc
Homeless Shelter
Health
10
Sacramento Neighborhood Housing
To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.
Housing & Shelter
11
Outsiders Inn
Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.
Housing & Shelter
12
Mikes Place a non-profit recovery house
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gathering Inn and the most unlike its peers is Spirit - Peers for Independence &. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$1,689,808Other$1,681,467Housing & Shelter$1,318,204Health$59,372
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA5.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation HOMELESS RESOURCE COUNCIL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Sierra Roots.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 454897093 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Sierra Roots, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Homeless Resource Council?
Find your warmest path to Homeless Resource Council through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines