Skip to content
Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare at a glance

· Public charity

Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare

The HOLLY FREDERICK REYNOLDS SUPPORT FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL WELFARE's mission is to support animal welfare programs in 501(c)(3) organizations.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Animals$175k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $120,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $157,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF LA$35,000
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE$30,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$25,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$10,000
SAVE THE CHIMPS$10,000
CHIMP HAVEN$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 6 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$285k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-33%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +19%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +19%
  • CHIMP HAVEN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • PE
    PEGASUS EQUINE GUARDIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC: $80,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INCANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $80,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTEHumane World for Animals Inc: $65,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $20,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE CHIMPS INCCHIMP HAVEN INC: $20,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $20,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC+1 more: $9,500 · Animals
Animals$294,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUISIANA INC: $80,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEGASUS EQUINE GUARDIAN ASSOCIATION: $9,500 over 1y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare?

    Find your warmest path to Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Holly Frederick Reynolds Support Foundation for Animal Welfare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home