Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hoegemeyer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$115kHealth$97kReligion$66kFood & Nutrition$57kHousing & Shelter$44kHuman Services$41kArts & Culture$16kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELKHORN NORTH HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
MIDLAND UNIVERSITY$10,000
TABITHA (MEALS ON WHEELS)$7,500
COLLEGE OF ST MARY$5,000
FAMILY SERVICE LINCOLN$5,000
FREMONT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$5,000
BRYAN FOUNDATION$5,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
CLINIC WITH A HEART$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN$1,000
PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 20 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
16

Total granted

$390k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-20%

Still filing today

55%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CLINIC WITH A HEART INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +17%
  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +10%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $15k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • EB
    ELKHORN BAND BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • WO
    WORD OF LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LF
    LUTHER FAMILY SERVICES (HEALTH CLINIC)
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
2
Lincoln Medical Education Partnership

To provide family practice training and, in support of that end, relevant healthcare education and services.

—
3
Lutheran Family Services Foundation Inc

To educate, inspire, motivate and assist stakeholders in developing gifts supporting the human care provided by lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.

Human Services
4
Friendship Home of Lincoln Inc

To provide emergency shelter

Human Services
5
Lincoln Land Community College Foundation

Cultivating and stewarding charitable gifts to support lincoln land community college students, programs and services.

Philanthropy
6
Lincoln Community Foundation Inc

Inspiring our community to give, act and lead.

Philanthropy
7
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
8
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
9
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
10
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
11
Methodist Fremont Health

The mission of methodist fremont health is to improve the quality of life by caring for the body and mind. methodist fremont health supports its mission of caring for people through the provision of inpatient and outpatient hospital…

Health
12
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sewing for Babies Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP BERGAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $52,500 · OtherARCHBISHOP BERGAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLTABITHA (MEALS ON WHEELS): $47,500 · OtherTABITHA (MEALS ON WHEELS)FREMONT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 · OtherFREMONT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYWORD OF LIFE: $35,000 · OtherWORD OF LIFEALL HOLY SPIRIT GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherELKHORN BAND BOOSTERS: $11,000 · OtherELKHORN NORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherWORD OF LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH INC: $10,000 · OtherLUTHER FAMILY SERVICES (HEALTH CLINIC): $10,000 · Other+18 more: $50,245 · Other+18 moreBryan Foundation: $40,800 · HealthBryan FoundationCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $40,000 · HealthCLINIC WITH A HEART …+2 more: $3,500 · HealthLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $15,000 · EducationMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $7,500 · Arts & CultureLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $7,500 · Crime & LegalPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$292,245Health$84,300Human Services$30,000Education$26,000Arts & Culture$22,500Crime & Legal$7,500Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBryan Foundation: $40,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $40,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFREMONT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEWING FOR BABIES INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC WITH A HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds SEWING FOR BABIES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Assurity Life Foundation · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · D F Dillon Foundation · Abel Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Pace Woods Foundation · Hugo a and Thelma Aspegren Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hoegemeyer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hoegemeyer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hoegemeyer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph