Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hildegarde D Becher Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$645kHuman Services$140kEducation$125kYouth Development$36kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$60,000
RYE YMCA$25,000
HOSPICE & PALIATIVE CARE OF WESTCHESTER$25,000
NEW SCHOOL$20,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY$11,000
THE PAP CORP$10,000
BLYTHEDALE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$10,000
JAWONIO INC$8,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ROCKLAND CO$7,500
CANCER SUPPORT TEAM$5,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF HUDSON VALLEY$5,000
FREEPORT MEMORIAL LIBRARY$5,000
YMCA OF MIDDLETOWN$3,000
SWIM ACCROSS AMERICA$2,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUB TOWN OF WALLKILL$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JAWONIO INC: $8k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLETOWN: $3k → 14%JAWONIO INC: $8k → 14%YMCA OF MIDDLETOWN: $3k → 14%JAWONIO INC: $8k → 14%JAWONIO INC: $8k → 14%JAWONIO Inc: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$918k · 15 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$918k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+35%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RYE NEW YORK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +49%
  • TN
    The New School
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • BC
    BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • HP
    Hospice Paliative Care of Westches
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AA
    Alzheimers Assn of the Hudson Valle
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
9
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blythedale Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RYE NEW YORK: $115,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RYE NEW YORKHOSPICE & PALIATIVE CARE OF WESTCHESTER: $100,000 · OtherHOSPICE & PALIATIVE CARE OF WESTCHESTERTHE PAP CORP: $50,000 · OtherTHE PAP CORPALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $41,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEYHospice Paliative Care of Westches: $25,000 · OtherHospice Paliative Care of WestchesFREEPORT MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $25,000 · OtherFREEPORT MEMORIAL LIBRARYBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $21,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF HUDSON VALLEY: $19,000 · Other+5 more: $27,700 · Other+5 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $302,145 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $25,500 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC+1 more: $6,000 · HealthThe New School: $100,000 · EducationThe New Sch…JAWONIO INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLETOWN NY: $6,000 · Human ServicesSwim Across America Inc: $12,500 · Philanthropy
Other$424,200Health$383,645Education$100,000Human Services$44,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $302,145 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RYE NEW YORK: $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe New School: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJAWONIO INC: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $25,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $21,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLETOWN NY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RYE NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds JAWONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLETOWN NY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hildegarde D Becher Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hildegarde D Becher Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hildegarde D Becher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph