· Private foundation
Highland Fairview Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| People in need from Moreno Valley | $12,500 |
| Riverside University Health System Foundation | $12,500 |
| Roadrunner Booster Club | $10,000 |
| Moreno Valley Chamber of Commerce | $10,000 |
| Riverside University Health System Foundation | $7,000 |
| Valley Life Athletics | $6,000 |
| Riverside County Works | $5,000 |
| Game Changer Event Series LLC | $5,000 |
| Moreno Valley Community Foundation | $5,000 |
| California Rush Soccer Club | $3,000 |
| US Vets Inland Empire | $2,500 |
| March Field Foundation | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RURiverside University Health System Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +210%
- RCRIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF RELIEF FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +102%
- RCRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- CJChabad Jewish Community Center of Riversideone grant, 2023 · $127k
- GSGOLDEN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +237%
- RSRISING STARS BUSINESS ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $63k · revenue +155%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of the organization is to promote business within the menifee valley area.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
A regional Chamber committed to improving the quality of community life driven by business leadership mentorship advocacy and prosperity.
To promote a business friendly environment and to enhance the quality of life and the economy of rancho cucamonga
To enhance and promote the economic and civic vitality of Rancho Mirage
Association of entities for the advancement of research, education, planning and management of salinity in the central valley.
To protect the natural diversity, cultural resources, scenic open space, and agricultural vitality of our ventura county ranch and costal areas.
To unite agencies, groups and individuals whose interests include protecting and enhancing Mountain County water resources throughout the foreseeable future.
The citrus county chamber of commerce exists to promote and support a quality of life in citrus county. this is done through advertising, hosting special events, and informational pursuits among other endeavors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moreno Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOLDEN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Riverside University Health System Foundation ↗
- Who funds RISING STARS BUSINESS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MORENO VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER BOOSTER CLUB ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds MORENO VALLEY PONY BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ↗
- Who funds MARCH FIELD FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Highland Fairview Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.