Skip to content

· Private foundation

Higashi Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$22kInternational$21kHuman Services$18kAnimals$15kYouth Development$12kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$7kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY$5,000
FRIENDS IN DEED$5,000
MISSION VALLEY FREE METHODIST CHURC$2,000
ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB$2,000
BSA TROOP 365$1,000
LITTLE TOKYO SERVICES CENTER$1,000
ARMED SERVICES YMCA$500
CHARITY WATCH$500
JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LITTLE TOKYO SERVICES CENTER: $1k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%FRIENDS IN DEED: $5k → 14%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $5k → 16%CHARITY WATCH: $500 → 14%ARMED SERVICES YMCA: $500 → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%FRIENDS IN DEED: $4k → 14%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $3k → 16%CHARITY WATCH: $300 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%FRIENDS IN DEED: $4k → 14%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $2k → 16%CHARITY WATCH: $250 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 9%ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%FRIENDS IN DEED: $4k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $2k → 16%CHARITY WATCH: $250 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 9%ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $2k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 9%ST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $2k → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $400 → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $400 → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $400 → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $400 → 14%JAPANESE AMERICAN NATL MUSEUM: $400 → 14%MISSION VALLEY FREE METHODIST CHURC: $2k → 14%BSA TROOP 365: $1k → 14%BSA TROOP 365: $1k → 14%GURRS AND PURRS: $6k → 14%GURRS AND PURRS: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 12 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$102k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+30%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    Friends In Deed
    4× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +3%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +39%
  • DA
    Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • MV
    MISSION VALLEY FREE METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • 1L
    1979 LEGACY CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +30%
  • AS
    ARMED SERVICES YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $22,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFriends In Deed: $17,000 · OtherFriends In DeedINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRY: $14,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CHILDCARE MINISTRYGURRS AND PURRS: $12,000 · OtherGURRS AND PURRSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GAB: $10,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST SAN GABST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $7,000 · OtherST VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELSGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 · Other+4 more: $6,050 · Other+4 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,000 · InternationalDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $3,000 · AnimalsJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & Culture1979 LEGACY CORP: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$92,550International$7,000Animals$3,000Arts & Culture$2,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends In Deed: $17,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget1979 LEGACY CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends In Deed ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Higashi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Higashi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Higashi Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph