Skip to content

· Public charity

Hidaya Foundation

To implement educational, environmental, social welfare, and health care programs in economically depressed areas of asia, africa and north america, with focus on projects which promote self-employment.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$5.3MPhilanthropy$829kEducation$577kHuman Services$503kReligion$61kHealth$15k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $3,115,956, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,857,295 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,741,339 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $640k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.4M
$90,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEROIC HEARTS ORGANIZATION$1,148,000
RAHBAR FOUNDATION$469,800
SADAGAAT USA$442,500
AMOUD FOUNDATION$319,320
AFGHAN RELIEF$221,700
Ihsan Foundation$168,175
CRESCENT FOUNDATION INC$110,020
UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF AND$90,000
American Relief Agency for th$50,550
EAST PLANO ISLAMIC CENTER SCH$25,000
PURE HANDS$21,000
IMAN NETWORKS INC$15,000
NORTHSTAR SCHOOL$10,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF CLAREMONT$9,391
GRANADA ISLAMIC SCHOOL$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AFGHAN RELIEF: $222k → 8%AFGHAN RELIEF: $20k → 8%RAHIMA FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $8.8M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$7.5M · 85% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERV

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.3M · 15% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERV

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 14 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$7.1M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+131%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Heroic Hearts Organization NFP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +107%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY FOR THE HORN OF AFRICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $985k · revenue +102%
  • S
    Sadagaat-USA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $922k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • KF
    Khifaya Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue +198%
  • RE
    Renaissance Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +131%
  • SA
    SHARE ATLANTA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
2
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
3
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
4
Humanitarian African Relief Organization

To help africans in need. our main focus is getting food, shelter, clothing and medicine to the needy

International
5
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
6
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
10
Humanity Increased

Humanity-Increased is an international charity whose mission is to help those in need and promote human transformation. The teachings of Islam inspire our mission, and we strive to embody its values of compassion, empathy, and service to…

International
11
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
12
The Hassan Foundation

To promote human development by preserving life through improving health and education amongst the poor people in pakistan. to provide clean potable water, support and education for orphans and homeless

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afghan Relief; the most unlike its peers is Renaissance Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Heroic Hearts Organization NFP: $1,868,000 · InternationalHeroic Hearts Organization NFPAMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY FOR THE HORN OF AFRICA: $984,732 · InternationalAMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY FOR THE HORN OF AFRICASadagaat-USA: $922,220 · InternationalSadagaat-USACRESCENT FOUNDATION INC: $449,741 · InternationalCRESCENT FOUNDATION INCPURE HANDS INC: $189,150 · InternationalRAHBAR FOUNDATION INC: $829,150 · PhilanthropyRAHBAR FOUNDATION INCAMOUD FOUNDATION: $549,070 · PhilanthropyAMOUD FOUNDATIONIHSAN FOUNDATION FOR WEST AFRICA: $699,896 · OtherIHSAN FOUNDATION…ALAMIDA FOUNDATION: $244,678 · OtherALAMIDA FOUNDATI…+9 more: $144,891 · Other+9 moreAFGHAN RELIEF: $241,530 · Human Services+1 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $90,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNorthstar School: $41,500 · EducationKhifaya Foundation Inc: $27,050 · Religion
International$4,413,843Philanthropy$1,378,220Other$1,089,465Human Services$248,530Public Safety & Disaster$90,000Education$41,500Religion$27,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeroic Hearts Organization NFP: $1,868,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetAMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY FOR THE HORN OF AFRICA: $984,732 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetSadagaat-USA: $922,220 over 4y, 25% of budgetRAHBAR FOUNDATION INC: $829,150 over 3y, 27% of budgetIHSAN FOUNDATION FOR WEST AFRICA: $699,896 over 8y, 11% of budgetAMOUD FOUNDATION: $549,070 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCRESCENT FOUNDATION INC: $449,741 over 7y, 46% of budgetAFGHAN RELIEF: $241,530 over 2y, 28% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $189,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthstar School: $41,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetRenaissance Education Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIMAN NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Heroic Hearts Organization NFP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY FOR THE HORN OF AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds Sadagaat-USA ↗
  • Who funds RAHBAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IHSAN FOUNDATION FOR WEST AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds AMOUD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFGHAN RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development ↗
  • Who funds Northstar School ↗
  • Who funds Khifaya Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IMAN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds FoundationCA22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Tabani Family Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · McKesson Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hidaya Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hidaya Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hidaya Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hidaya Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hidaya’s filings →

    More from the funding graph