Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hiatt Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$229kYouth Development$4k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$8,000
UC SAN DIEGO$4,500
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$4,500
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$4,500
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$4,500
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $1k → 13%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%SUMNER COLLEGE: $2k → 11%CONCORDE CAREER COLLEGE: $2k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY-VANCOUVE: $1k → 9%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 9%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
OR
CA
UT
VA
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 23 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$201k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+35%

Still filing today

26%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    Linfield University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +3%
  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +31%
  • PU
    PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CC
    CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -29%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • SL
    SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
11
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
12
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Linfield University; the most unlike its peers is Citrus County 4-H Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,500 · OtherPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITYUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $14,500 · OtherUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITYPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $13,500 · OtherPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITYBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $8,800 · OtherOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $7,500 · OtherUC SAN DIEGO: $7,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY-VANCOUVE: $6,000 · Other+25 more: $61,550 · Other+25 moreLinfield University: $22,300 · EducationLinfield UniversityGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $15,250 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITYPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $8,300 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERSITYWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $4,800 · EducationThe University of Tampa Inco…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · Youth Development
Other$170,350Education$58,150Youth Development$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLinfield University: $22,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $15,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $8,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hiatt Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hiatt Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Pacific University: 5% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 4% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hiatt’s filings →

More from the funding graph