Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hh Camp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$40kRecreation & Sports$28kHuman Services$15kHealth$14kArts & Culture$11kAnimals$2kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$249k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC$5,560
MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$2,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC$1,500
GATHERING OF SE WISCONSIN$1,500
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$1,000
WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $2k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $1k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Hh Camp Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Hh Camp Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$102k · 14 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$102k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+12%

Still filing today

86%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $14k · revenue +62%
  • ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $13k · revenue +129%
  • MY
    MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • FS
    FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +12%
  • ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • SM
    ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

3
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
4
Milwaukee Math and Science Academy Inc

The mission of milwaukee math and science academy, inc. is to create a learning community in which:-teachers, parents and students work together to develop young people who are confident and achieve academic excellence in a powerful…

Education
5
One City Schools Inc

Our mission is to seed a new model of public education that ensures young children are on track to succeed in a college or career preparatory program from birth through high school graduation.

Human Services
6
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

7
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
8
Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

Education
9
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

10
Milwaukee Jewish Day School Inc

Where academic excellence and jewish values prepare children for a lifetime of success, leadership and engagement with the world.

11
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
12
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Milwaukee Science Education Consortium Inc and the most unlike its peers is College Possible Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $27,610 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $9,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · OtherPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INCFIRST STAGE CHILDREN'S TRUST (FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE INC) — $4,000 · OtherFIRST STAGE CHILDREN'S TRUST (FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE IN…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INC — $2,000 · Other+3 more — $3,500 · Other+3 moreALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $13,000 · EducationALL-IN MILWAUKEE INCMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $7,025 · EducationMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCO…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $3,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INCCARMEN HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,000 · EducationCARMEN HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE…ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 · EducationROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSI…THE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $1,000 · EducationPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $14,000 · HealthPENFIELD CHILD…UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COM…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHO…FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE — $2,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 · Animals
Other$53,110Education$29,025Health$14,000Human Services$10,500Arts & Culture$2,000Animals$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $27,610 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $7,025 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENFIELD MONTESSORI ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEN HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Northwestern Mutual Life Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · City Forward Collective Inc · Arzbaecher Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hh Camp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hh Camp Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hh Camp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph