How much did HH CAMP FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of HH CAMP FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

stagepenfield

2019

stage

2020

stage

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$296k

Total assets

Largest grants

CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC$5,560
MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$2,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC$1,500
GATHERING OF SE WISCONSIN$1,500
WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 81% of HH CAMP FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 17% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

HH CAMP FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$101k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$101k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%

+86%

Still filing today

73%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
PENFIELD CHILDRENS CENTER
5× · 2018–2022 · $14k · revenue +18%
ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC
5× · 2019–2023 · $13k · revenue +20%
UC
UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
6× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +111%

Funded once

ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INCgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +86%
FS
FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE INC
one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -25%
DH
DR HOWARD FULLER ACADEMY
one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Milwaukee Science Education

The mission of the milwaukee academy of science, an exemplary leader in stem education, is to graduate urban students prepared to compete successfully at the post-secondary level.

Education

The University School of Milwaukee

University school of milwaukee provides an exceptional pk-12 independent school education in a supportive, inclusive community built on the foundation of our common trust. by igniting a passion for learning, leadership, and service, the…

Education

Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education

Wisconsin Montessori Society Inc

Educating youngsters to become an informed, committed, and difference-making generation

Education

Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The organization's mission is to provide a high quality education that gives all students choices after graduation that provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom and build a legacy.

—

Meridian Public Charter School

To inspire a passion for learning in our students and help them build self-confidence.

Education

Central City Cyberschool of

The mission of the school is to motivate in each child from milwaukee's central city, the love of learning, the academic, social and leadership skills necessary to engage in critical thinking, and the ability to demonstrate mastery of the…

Education

Mastery Charter High School

Students learn the skills needed for post secondary success and are able to pursue their dreams.

Education

Milwaukee Development Corporation

Regional economic development

Community Improvement

Children's Community School Inc

Provide a nurturing montessori education to children ages 18 months to 6 years old.

Human Services

Mastery Charter School -

Students learn the skills needed for post-secondary success and are able to pursue their dreams.

Education

Madison Community Montessori

Madison community montessori school is a private, independent, non-profit school accredited by the association montessori internationale. the school has served families from the greater madison area since 1972.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee and the most unlike its peers is Mcpreparatory School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

7/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$61,110Education$21,025Health$14,000Human Services$10,500Animals$2,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee &WI22.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HH CAMP FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 391136315 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hh Camp Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hh Camp Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HH CAMP FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hh Camp Foundation?

More from the funding graph

HH CAMP FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hh Camp Foundation?

More from the funding graph