Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$441kPhilanthropy$53kInternational$26kHealth$2kEducation$2kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$250Food & Nutrition$180Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$3,007
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV 52 STREET$28,400
VARIOUS$24,182
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OHR HAMAIER$4,250
Individual grant recipient$3,007
UTA OF BORO PARK$3,000
CHOMES YERUSHLAYIM INC$2,000
CONGREGATION YESHIVA OHR PNEI YEHOSHUA$1,000
CONGREGATION BRIS AVROM ZLOZITZ$560
CONGREGATION BAIS ARON$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $518) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BETH OLOTH: $500 → 14%OZER DALIM FAMILY ASSIST CHARITABLE ORG: $18 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$384k · 82 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +122% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

82 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
176

Total granted

$384k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+122%
+10%

Still filing today

2%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +168%
  • OH
    OHR HAMAIER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +101%
  • RC
    ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $660 · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • AF
    American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue -55%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH HILLEL
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
5
Keren Torah Vchesed

Keren torah vchesed inc. is the american fundraising arm of irgun hesh hatorah an established israeli religious organization that maintains religious centers for worship and torah study and alleeviates poverty in israel

International
6
Yad Leazor Torah Vochesed Fund
Philanthropy
7
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
8
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
9
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Keren Ateres Yitzchok Trust
Philanthropy
11
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beis Yosef Chaim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 259 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION YETEV LEV 52 STREET: $65,980 · OtherCONGREGATION YETEV LEV 52 STREETCONGREGATION YESHIVA OIR PNEI YEHOSHUA: $50,570 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA OIR PNEI YEHOSHUAVARIOUS: $32,707 · OtherVARIOUSKOLEL YETEV LEV DJERUSALEM: $15,000 · Other+182 more: $285,705 · Other+182 moreOHR HAMAIER INC: $25,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $9,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $31,512 · Philanthropy+1 more: $660 · PhilanthropyMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $2,500 · ReligionTRUE TORAH JEWS INC: $500 · ReligionYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $360 · ReligionANSHEI LUBAVITCH INC: $250 · ReligionKEREN ZICHRON YISROEL MEIER INC: $180 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED: $180 · ReligionBETH OLOTH: $500 · Human ServicesKUMI URI USA: $500 · HealthBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $180 · International
Other$449,962Education$35,000Philanthropy$32,172Religion$3,970Human Services$500Health$500International$180

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $31,512 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetOHR HAMAIER INC: $25,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS FAMILY RELIEF INC: $1,100 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNew York University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $660 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH OLOTH: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUE TORAH JEWS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKUMI URI USA: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSHEI LUBAVITCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMUNAH VCHESED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON YISROEL MEIER INC: $180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR HAMAIER INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY102.8× affinity131 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · S&E Foundation · Keren Ish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 259 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph