Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herman & Mary K Seibel Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$348k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MEducation$1.0MHealth$420kInternational$105kYouth Development$90kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $282k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOVNANIAN SCHOOL$61,220
ARCHDIOCESE OF THE SYRIAC ORTHODOX CHURCH$45,000
ASSYRIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF VIRGIN MARY$45,000
HOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INC$32,000
AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED USA$30,000
MEKHITARIST FATHERS OF VIENNA$30,000
BETH MARDUTHO OF THE SYRIAC INSTITUTEE$25,000
PACE UNIVERSITY$20,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$15,000
STS VARTANANTZ SCHOOL$10,000
ASSYRIAN ORPHANAGE AND SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC$10,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$10,000
ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$10,000
FESTIVAL OF THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of Herman & Mary K Seibel Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 15%.

Herman & Mary K Seibel Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 17 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+101%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOVNANIAN SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $461k · revenue +53%
  • HM
    HOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $283k · revenue +21%
  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • BM
    BETH MARDUTHO OF THE SYRIAC
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Marys Hospital for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSYRIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF VIRGIN MARY: $375,000 · OtherASSYRIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF VIRGIN MARYARCHDIOCESE OF THE SYRIAC ORTHODOX CHURCH: $330,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF THE SYRIAC ORTHODOX CHURCHHOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INC: $283,000 · OtherHOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INCAID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED INC: $265,000 · OtherAID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED INCMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $160,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERBETH MARDUTHO OF THE SYRIAC INSTITUTEE: $151,000 · OtherBETH MARDUTHO OF THE SYRIAC INSTITUTEEMEKHITARIST FATHERS OF VIENNA INC: $135,000 · OtherMEKHITARIST FATHERS OF VIENNA INCASSYRIAN ORPHANAGE AND SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $105,000 · OtherFESTIVAL OF THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Other+4 more: $99,000 · OtherHOVNANIAN SCHOOL INC: $460,947 · EducationHOVNANIAN SCHOOL INCPACE UNIVERSITY: $175,000 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYFAIRVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY: $49,288 · EducationFAIRVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationAmerican Diabetes Association: $110,000 · HealthAmerican …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 · HealthST JUDE C…ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $40,000 · HealthST MARYS …ST MARYS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · HealthST MARYS …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,993,000Education$690,235Health$250,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOVNANIAN SCHOOL INC: $460,947 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetHOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INC: $283,000 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $175,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetASSYRIAN ORPHANAGE AND SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $105,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY: $49,288 over 6y, 16% of budgetST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGODS CHILDREN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOVNANIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY MARTYRS ARMENIAN DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ASSYRIAN ORPHANAGE AND SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVIEW PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GODS CHILDREN ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herman & Mary K Seibel Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herman & Mary K Seibel Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hovnanian School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herman & Mary K Seibel’s filings →

More from the funding graph