· Private foundation
Herma Moeller Procopiadi Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH | $30,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| AMOS HOUSE | $25,000 |
| MCAULEY MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| THE PROVIDENCE SINGERS | $20,000 |
| THE DOMINICAN FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| LUKE'S WINGS | $15,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS | $10,000 |
| ADVOCATES INC | $10,000 |
| BARRINGTON TAP-IN | $10,000 |
| THE X FOR BOYS | $10,000 |
| PETIT FAMILY FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| HOPE HEALTH HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE | $7,000 |
| MOTHER OF LIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +18%
MCAULEY CORPORATION6× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +45%- AHAMOS HOUSE6× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- MDMA DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESSone grant, 2020 · $5k
- ICIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH MOTHER THERESA FUNDone grant, 2020 · $5k
- RIRHODE ISLAND KIDS COUNT INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our purpose is to offer our skills and hearts to help patients and families live each day with hope and dignity.
Preservation of affordable housing in the state of rhode island
To be a proactive advocate for the hospitals in rhode island that is capable of working for and with the hospitals to positively influence public opinion, legislative outcomes and regulatory policy. the purpose of such advocacy is to…
Refocus is a human service agency that serves adults with differing physical and developmental needs. we are an organization of dedicated people offering opportunities for growth in a loving, trusting, and challenging environment. we value…
Support the advocacy of community hospitals.
The rhode island foundation mobilizes generosity and motivates change that makes a difference
The organization's mission is to eliminate health disparities in rhode island and beyond. the organization develops innovative public health programs, conducts translational and policy research, provides clinical services, and trains…
To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in rhode island.
Halom house, inc. is a private, non-profit residential agency supporting adults with developmental disabilities in the southern ohio area. halom house, inc. is dedicated to upholding the rights and responsibilities of every client served;…
To assist rhode islanders with differing abilities in their efforts to achieve full inclusion in society and to exercise their civil and human rights through the provision of legal advocacy.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amos House and the most unlike its peers is Hummel Report. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MCAULEY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMOS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE PROVIDENCE SINGERS INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON TAP-IN INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PETIT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF PROVIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HUMMEL REPORT ↗
- Who funds HOPEHEALTH HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds Congress of the Birds ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR RI SOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND KIDS COUNT INC ↗
- Who funds MAN UP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Beacon Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Champlin Foundation · Point32health Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Herma Moeller Procopiadi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Herma Moeller Procopiadi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Herma Moeller Procopiadi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.