Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herbert & Yvonne Missry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$612k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$267k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of HERBERT & YVONNE MISSRY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $267k
$14,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAGEN DAVID$267,180
DSN$60,000
MAGAN DAVID SYNAGOGUE$33,823
Individual grant recipient$30,593
NY CANCER CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$28,701
MAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL$26,000
OHEL SIMCHA SUPER FUND$20,200
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHAZAK$14,500
ALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION$13,000
THE SAFE FOUNDATION$12,600
CHABAD OF ST TROPEZ$11,674
BONEI OLAM$10,590
THE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION FOR$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $27k → 20%MOISES SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $4k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $4k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $11k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 24 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$1.7M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+65%

Still filing today

29%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $69k · revenue +118%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +43%
  • AM
    ALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $41k · revenue +63% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • ND
    NYU DEVELOPMENT HIGHER EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
3
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
4
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
5
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
6
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

8
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
11
Hahaim Yeshivat Shalom Inc
Education
12
Chabad Jewish Center of Stamford Inc

servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moise Safra Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sephardic Heritage Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr15%15%5–10yr21%23%10–20yr22%27%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr9%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr15%12%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr22%45%20–35yr14%15%35–55yr9%4%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
11%
3,927/36,051

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID — $456,615 · OtherMAGEN DAVIDIndividual grant recipient — $191,278 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $101,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $97,255 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC — $81,312 · OtherTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INCMAGEN DAVID SYNAGOGUE — $73,647 · OtherDSN — $60,000 · OtherUJA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Other+28 more — $380,819 · Other+28 moreNew York Cancer Center Inc — $170,000 · HealthNew York Ca…MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · HealthMONMOUTH ME…SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC — $68,504 · Youth DevelopmentCHAZAK — $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $40,300 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc — $20,590 · Human ServicesMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $5,200 · Human ServicesALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION — $41,470 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC — $3,000 · PhilanthropyMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC — $26,000 · EducationTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC — $6,200 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 — $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,491,926Health$190,000Youth Development$83,004Human Services$66,090Philanthropy$44,470Education$26,000Food & Nutrition$12,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc — $170,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC — $68,504 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC — $42,900 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION — $41,470 over 3y, 27% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $40,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc — $20,590 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $18,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetBerit Shalom Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYAD DAVID INC — $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds MAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHAZAK
  • Who funds Berit Shalom Inc
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mamiye Foundation IncNJ32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation · Joseph Jack Sitt 1986 - Charitable Trust · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · Jack H Ashkenazie Foundation · Ims Foundation · N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbert & Yvonne Missry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herbert & Yvonne Missry Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herbert & Yvonne Missry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph