Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herbert & Katherine Kurth Religious Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$322kEnvironment$245kHuman Services$136kEducation$56kArts & Culture$30kAnimals$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORG FOR BLACK MARITIME GRADUATES$10,000
EASTERSEALS KINDCARE$10,000
CHARITY WATER$10,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$10,000
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
GREEN AMERICA$10,000
WATER FOR PEOPLE$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITY WATER: $13k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $13k → 17%Charity Water: $10k → 17%Charity Water: $10k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%Charity Water: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
NJ
CT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$817k · 16 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$817k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREEN AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +23%
  • WF
    WATER FOR PEOPLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +42%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity International
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • EO
    EASTERSEALS OF SE WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

2
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
10
Water First International

Water 1st's mission is to enable the world's poorest people to implement and sustain community-managed projects integrating clean water supply, sanitation and hygiene education. water 1st unites people to fight the global water and…

Philanthropy
11
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
12
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water for People and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WATER FOR PEOPLE — $80,600 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLELUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $80,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $80,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $80,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTEADVANCE COMMUNITY — $76,000 · InternationalADVANCE COMMUNITYWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 · International+2 more — $5,600 · InternationalEASTERSEALS KINDCARE — $66,000 · OtherEASTERSEALS KINDCAREORG FOR BLACK MARITIME GRADUATES — $56,000 · OtherORG FOR BLACK MARITIME …Organization of Black Maritime Coll — $29,000 · OtherOrganization of Black M…Habitat for Humanity International — $10,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity In…EASTERSEALS OF SE WISCONSIN — $10,000 · OtherEASTERSEALS OF SE WISCO…+3 more — $6,000 · OtherGREEN AMERICA — $85,100 · AnimalsGREEN AMERI…CHARITY GLOBAL INC — $80,100 · Human ServicesCHARITY GL…+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $80,100 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…Feeding America — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$417,200Other$177,000Animals$85,100Human Services$81,600Environment$80,100Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREEN AMERICA — $85,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE — $80,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $80,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $80,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE COMMUNITY — $76,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRASAD PROJECT INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE
  • Who funds ADVANCE COMMUNITY
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds THE PRASAD PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds Charity Navigator

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbert & Katherine Kurth Religious Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herbert & Katherine Kurth Religious Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Herbert & Katherine Kurth Religious Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph