Skip to content
Henry Booth House at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Henry Booth House

The organization is organized to provide social services for children and families from Birth thru five years of age.

$9.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$29MHuman Services$11MYouth Development$9.0M
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+15 grants · $8.2M
$340,264
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hobby Horse Nursery Schools Ltd Lake Shore Schools$1,681,398
West Austin Development Center$801,335
Trinity Resources Unlimited Inc - High Mountain$641,155
Black Rhino Inc dba Building Blocks$614,615
Trinity Resources Unlimited Inc-Hope For Youth$568,206
Prodigy Child Learning$567,628
Community Education Network-ITAV Family Of Schools$495,848
Jelly Bean (74th)$450,008
Howard Area$431,237
Star Kids Math & Science Academy Inc$414,272
The Martin Group 13338 LLC dba Eastside Development Center$405,097
Loop Learning CenterInc$340,264
Little Angels Family$293,554
Kidz Colony Daycare Inc$277,077
Little Folks Daycare$255,563
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Little Leaders Of Tomorrow: $19k → 14%Little Leaders Of Tomorrow: $14k → 14%Howard Area: $463k → 14%Howard Area: $431k → 14%Howard Area: $327k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $600k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $568k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $558k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $497k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $253k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $230k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $168k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $122k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning: $57k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49M · 33 repeat orgs$961k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
10

Total granted

$49M
$961k

Still filing today

24%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TRINITY RESOURCES UNLIMITED INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.5M · revenue +81% · 88% of their budget
  • PC
    PRODIGY CHILD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +120% · 33% of their budget
  • WA
    WEST AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.9M · revenue +48% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • LS
    Lake Shore Schools (Hobby Horse Schools)
    one grant, 2022 · $420k
  • CS
    Chicago State University (Delegate Agency)
    one grant, 2022 · $220k
  • SS
    SOUTH SHORE UNITED METHODIST CHILD CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $146k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kid Central

Our mission is to provide quality and safe childcare for the families in our community and provide our youngest learners with a positive start to their education journey.

Education
2
Beggining Child Care Center

Child care services and child preschool instruction

Education
3
East Side Early Learning Center

The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.

Human Services
4
Joyful Learning Edc

In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.

Education
5
Tlc Child Care Inc

Provide christian based daycare and pre-school

Human Services
6
Aurelia Daycare Inc

Provide high quality child care and creative opportunities for growth, development, and lifelong learning in a nurturing, reliable, and affordable environment.

Human Services
7
Children's Discovery Center

Education and social developement center to provide preschool and after school care to children while promoting a child's emotional, educational and physical growth.

Education
8
Tiny Tots & Dots Learning Academy

Day Care ServicesYour needs and your childs needs are our top priority Our focus is on development and communication skills of children We work closely with parents and our community

Education
9
Innabi Day Care Inc

Daycare

—
10
We Care Learning and Development Center

Early Education and Child Care Services

Education
11
Little Beginnings Child Development Ctr

Little Beginnings provides pre kindergarten and day care to children under 6 years of age. We believe that learning and playing are synonymous for the preschool age child. Young children learn best when they have an opportunity to practice…

—
12
Loretto Child Care Center Inc

Non-profit childcare program serving children 6 wks-12 yrs old. 24 hour service(if needed). developmental program meeting needs of children.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prodigy Child Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kenyattas Day Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Building Blocks: $4,182,114 · OtherBuilding BlocksHobby Horse Nursery Schools Ltd Lake Shore Schools: $4,012,222 · OtherHobby Horse Nursery Schools Ltd Lake Shore SchoolsJelly Bean (74th): $2,600,806 · OtherJelly Bean (74th)West Austin Development: $2,502,559 · OtherWest Austin DevelopmentLittle Angels Family: $1,830,962 · OtherLittle Angels FamilyStar Kids Math & Science Academy INC: $1,782,561 · Other4Ever Young: $1,754,098 · OtherEastside Development Center: $1,751,977 · OtherLittle Folks Daycare: $1,700,844 · OtherLakeview Development: $1,453,487 · OtherLoop Learning Center Inc: $1,338,967 · OtherYoung Achievers Academy: $1,247,221 · Other+24 more: $7,599,372 · Other+24 moreTRINITY RESOURCES UNLIMITED INC: $7,508,220 · EducationTRINITY RESOURCES UNLIMITE…WEST AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2,948,977 · EducationWEST AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CE…COMMUNITY EDUCATION NETWORK: $932,533 · EducationCOMMUNITY EDUCATION NETWOR…+1 more: $255,756 · EducationPRODIGY CHILD INC: $3,052,321 · Human ServicesPRODIGY C…Howard Area Community Center: $1,221,778 · Human ServicesHoward Ar…+1 more: $32,729 · Human Services
Other$33,757,190Education$11,645,486Human Services$4,306,828

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY RESOURCES UNLIMITED INC: $7,508,220 over 9y, 88% of budgetPRODIGY CHILD INC: $3,052,321 over 9y, 33% of budgetWEST AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2,948,977 over 6y, 40% of budgetHoward Area Community Center: $1,221,778 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetKENYATTAS DAY CARE: $1,104,040 over 4y, 40% of budgetCOMMUNITY EDUCATION NETWORK: $932,533 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetINSTITUTE OF POSITIVE EDUCATION: $255,756 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetLITTLE LEADERS OF TOMORROW DAYCARE: $32,729 over 2y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY RESOURCES UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Howard Area Community Center ↗
  • Who funds KENYATTAS DAY CARE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EDUCATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF POSITIVE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEADERS OF TOMORROW DAYCARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Illinois Action for C…
Illinois Action for ChildrenIL25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illinois Action for Children

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry Booth House funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry Booth House. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Henry Booth House?

    Find your warmest path to Henry Booth House through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry Booth House’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home