Skip to content
Henry and Arline Gluck Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Henry and Arline Gluck Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$544kReligion$181kAnimals$79kPhilanthropy$49kHealth$45kCivil Rights$20kInternational$15kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE$21,670
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 11%MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
NM
AR
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 14 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$360k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+29%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Open Heart Foundation
    4× · 2019–2023 · $35k · revenue +52% · 99% of their budget
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +78%
  • TV
    The Venables Foundation
    2× · 2019–2021 · $14k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • MN
    Maman Nonprofit
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Marfan Foundation Inc

See schedule o.the marfan foundation drives research, education and support and builds community to improve outcomes, save lives and empower all people to thrive who are living with marfan, loeys-dietz, vascular ehlers-danlos syndromes,…

—
2
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
3
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
4
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns

Founded in 1986, mtppi is a research organization specializing in health service research, education and health policy analysis of new and emerging technologies.

Health
9
Veterans Medical Research Foundation of San Diego

Honoring military service with science; our bench-to-bedside approach has led to breakthroughs in areas such as shingles prevention, heart disease, metabolic diseases and ground breaking work on post-traumatic stress disorder.

Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Venables Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $543,053 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $140,880 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLEWAGS AND WALKS RESCUE: $70,545 · OtherWAGS AND WALKS RESCUEADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATION: $40,000 · OtherADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATIONCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE+15 more: $19,690 · Other+15 moreOpen Heart Foundation: $35,010 · PhilanthropyThe Venables Foundation: $13,517 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 · Civil RightsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE SAMUEL AND BARBARA MASKET FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $600 · HealthMaman Nonprofit: $15,000 · InternationalMGVP INC Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project: $8,000 · Animals+1 more: $200 · Animals
Education$544,053Other$296,115Philanthropy$48,527Civil Rights$20,000Health$17,600International$15,000Animals$8,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $543,053 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Heart Foundation: $35,010 over 4y, 99% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Venables Foundation: $13,517 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMGVP INC Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEL-AIR ASSOCIATION: $1,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAMUEL AND BARBARA MASKET FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THALIANS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPERFECT PET RESCUE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry and Arline Gluck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry and Arline Gluck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry and Arline Gluck’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home