Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$473kFood & Nutrition$68kEmployment$67kHuman Services$60kYouth Development$58kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEN FRANKLIN VOCATIONAL CENTER$35,000
WV STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$20,000
BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC$10,000
BACKPACKBUDDYORG$10,000
SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHARLESTON WV$10,000
EDUCATION ELEVATORS FDN$7,500
SHAWNEE PARK FOUNDATION INC$5,000
DUNBAR - INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ARTS IN ACTION INC: $5k → 10%ARTS IN ACTION INC: $5k → 10%DUNBAR - INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER: $4k → 18%DUNBAR - INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER: $4k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$745k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$745k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +27%
  • BI
    BACKPACKBUDDYORG INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +76%
  • EE
    EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +60%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Southwest Virginia Public

    Education assistance

    —
    2
    Food for Kids

    The primary mission is to provide supplementary food during the school for food-insecure students located in bedford county virginia

    Human Services
    3
    Berkeley County Backpack Program Inc

    Provide food for underprivileged school children.

    Food & Nutrition
    4
    Binda Dyslexia Center
    —
    5
    Wvu Forestry Endowment Fund of the Wvu Forestry Alumni Association

    Maintenance of the wvu school of forestry endowment fund

    —
    6
    Louisville Winston Ed Foundation

    Kindergarten thru 12th grade school

    Education
    7
    Back Pack for Kids

    Provide food for school age children.

    Philanthropy
    8
    Wyoming County Toy Fund Inc

    To provide toys during christmas for underprivilaged children in wyoming county, wv.

    Human Services
    9
    West Va Farm Bureau Foundation Inc

    Sponsor agricultural education programs for students and the general public.

    Education
    10
    Helping Others Progress through Education Inc

    Charity and Education

    Health
    11
    Central Child Care of Wv

    Supervision of child care providers

    Human Services
    12
    Boomerang Backpacks Inc

    To nourish low income elementary students on weekends by providing backpacks full of food, and to inspire high school students to experience community service through project based learning and student internships.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Elevators Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dunbar-Institute Samaritan Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    4/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    WV STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $180,000 · OtherWV STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONBEN FRANKLIN VOCATIONAL CENTER: $70,000 · OtherBEN FRANKLIN VOCATIONAL CENTERGARNET CAREER CENTER: $67,000 · OtherGARNET CAREER CENTERKANAWHA COUNTY SCHOOLS: $65,000 · OtherKANAWHA COUNTY SCHOOLSSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHARLESTON WV: $37,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHARLESTON WVSHAWNEE PARK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $8,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $120,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARL…EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · EducationEDUCATION ELEVATORS FOU…BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesBOB BURDETT…ARTS IN ACTION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesARTS IN ACT…DUNBAR-INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesDUNBAR-INST…BACKPACKBUDDYORG INC: $52,000 · Food & NutritionSHAWNEE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
    Other$447,500Education$157,500Human Services$78,000Food & Nutrition$52,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOB BURDETTE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetBACKPACKBUDDYORG INC: $52,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetEDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetSHAWNEE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDUNBAR-INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 11% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
    • Who funds BOB BURDETTE CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds BACKPACKBUDDYORG INC ↗
    • Who funds EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds ARTS IN ACTION INC ↗
    • Who funds SHAWNEE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds DUNBAR-INSTITUTE SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Helen W Poffenbarger and Perry S Poffenbarger’s filings →

      More from the funding graph