Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen V Werner and John M Werner Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$5kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$2kCrime & Legal$2kHealth$1kReligion$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$400
Median grant
2
States reached
$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,860
The Calumet Club$500
NKMNSC$500
Sheboygan Humane Society$500
Weill Center$500
Making Spirits Bright$500
Northside Food Pantry$500
Safe Harbor$400
Make A Wish Wisconsin$360
Aspen Center for Environmental Stud$360
Project Angel Hugs$360
Wounded Warriors United of Wisconsi$360
St Vincent de Paul$350
DunGood Riders$250
Toys For Tots$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $860) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $250 → 14%Project Angel Hugs: $360 → 9%Deland Receiving Home: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
25

Total granted

$36k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

31%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k
  • MS
    MAKING SPIRITS BRIGHT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NF
    NOURISH FARMS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $750
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $650

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Hope Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

Hospice care - wings of hope hospice and palliative care, inc. provides compassionate care in the later stages of life and support through the grief experience for individuals and families.

Human Services
2
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
3
Wildwoods

To feed and care for abandoned or injured animals

Animals
4
Seasons Hospice of Muskogee Inc

Our mission is to provide hospice care to terminally ill patients and their families regardless of their ability to pay. staff is on call 24 hours a day to provide nursing, pastoral and bereavement care.

Human Services
5
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
6
Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin

Service for disabled adults

Human Services
7
Underdog Pet Rescue of Wisconsin Inc

Underdog pet rescue is an all-breed companion animal rescue and vet clinic based out of dane county, wisconsin. our mission is to find permanent homes for animals in need and to enrich lives by strengthening the connection between animals…

Animals
8
Wings of Rescue Inc

Flies large scale transports of at-risk shelter pets from disaster areas and overcrowded shelters to brick and mortar shelters where there is empty kennel space and where no local shelter pets are displaced by our flights.

Animals
9
Meals On Wheels of Loveland and Berthoud Inc

Meals on wheels of loveland and berthoud seeks to nourish and enrich the lives of homebound individuals by providing nutritious meals and daily contact with a caring volunteer.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
11
Winter Wildlands Alliance Inc

To inspire and empower people to protect america's wild snowscapes

Human Services
12
Wilderness Fellowship Ministries Inc

To provide a place of refuge, peace, restoration and hope, dedicated to help people establish intimacy with jesus christ and those they love.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspen Center for Environmental Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $9,360 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $7,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNorthside Food Pantry — $2,850 · OtherNorthside Food PantrySafe Harbor — $2,100 · OtherSafe HarborDeland Receiving House — $1,800 · OtherThe Salvation Army — $1,800 · OtherHumane Society of Sheboygan — $1,650 · OtherSheboygan Humane Society — $1,650 · OtherWeill Center — $1,500 · Other+26 more — $7,660 · Other+26 moreMAKING SPIRITS BRIGHT INC — $3,500 · Arts & CultureNOURISH FARMS INC — $1,600 · Food & NutritionMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,110 · HealthSHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC — $50 · HealthDUN-GOOD RIDERS INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT ANGEL HUGS — $360 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $250 · Human ServicesTHE DELAND RECEIVING HOME INC — $250 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIORS UNITED OF WISCONSIN INC — $610 · Public Benefit
Other$37,520Arts & Culture$3,500Food & Nutrition$1,600Health$1,160Recreation & Sports$1,000Human Services$860Public Benefit$610

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKING SPIRITS BRIGHT INC — $3,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNOURISH FARMS INC — $1,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,110 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUN-GOOD RIDERS INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS UNITED OF WISCONSIN INC — $610 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOOKWORM GARDENS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DELAND RECEIVING HOME INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAKING SPIRITS BRIGHT INC
  • Who funds NOURISH FARMS INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds DUN-GOOD RIDERS INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS UNITED OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BOOKWORM GARDENS INC
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HUGS
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE DELAND RECEIVING HOME INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Merkel Foundation Inc · The Sartori Family Foundation Inc · Wm Collins Kohler Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helen V Werner and John M Werner Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph