Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen M Harrison Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$710k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$490kScience & Tech$100kArts & Culture$80kFood & Nutrition$75kHealth$25kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $540k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED)$540,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$50,000
WAHL'S RESEARCH FUND$50,000
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIBRARY SOCIETY$25,000
SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UKRANIAN DIABETES PROJECT: $25k → 9%SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE: $25k → 13%WFMT: $50k → 14%SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE: $25k → 13%WFMT: $30k → 14%SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE: $20k → 13%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $25k → 14%SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE: $20k → 13%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $25k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $25k → 14%NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIBRARY SOCIETY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIBRARY SOCIETY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIBRARY SOCIETY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LIBRARY SOCIETY: $25k → 14%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $710k → 14%VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS PER LOG: $560k → 14%VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS PER LOG: $540k → 14%VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $540k → 14%VARIOUS CHARIBUTIONS PER LOG: $520k → 14%VAROUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $442k → 14%VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $387k → 14%VAROUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $363k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 10 repeat orgs$545k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -75% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.6M
$545k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-75%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +6%
  • TC
    The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame
    4× · 2020–2023 · $90k · revenue +45%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $75k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARIBUTIONS PER LOG
    one grant, 2017 · $520k
  • UD
    Ukrainian Diabetes Project
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS PER LOG: $1,100,000 · OtherVARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS PER LOGVARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $927,000 · OtherVARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED)VAROUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED): $804,000 · OtherVAROUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 25000 PER LOG (ATTACHED)VARIOUS CHARIBUTIONS PER LOG: $519,800 · OtherVARIOUS CHARIBUTIONS PER LOG+3 more: $280,000 · Other+3 moreCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationCHICAGO PU…THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $100,000 · EducationTHE NEWBER…The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $90,000 · EducationThe Corpor…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $75,000 · Food & NutritionUkrainian Diabetes Project: $25,000 · Health
Other$3,630,800Education$390,000Food & Nutrition$75,000Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Diabetes Project ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen M Harrison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen M Harrison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $710k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen M Harrison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph