Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen Harrington Charitable Tr Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$930kPhilanthropy$558kHuman Services$161kHousing & Shelter$45k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $180k
$11,164
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION$49,119
MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND$42,868
MINNDEPENDENT$42,868
JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE$11,164
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$11,164
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION$11,164
DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$11,164
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$1,786
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BELOIT COLLEGE$1,786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE: $12k → 11%JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE: $12k → 11%JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE: $12k → 11%JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE: $11k → 11%JONES HARRISON RESIDENCE: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$1.2M
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MINNDEPENDENT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $179k · revenue +1%
  • DC
    DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +56%
  • PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +105%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Minnesota Medical Association

    To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

    —
    2
    Mitchell Hamline School of Law

    Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

    Education
    3
    Minnesota Business Partnership

    The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

    —
    4
    University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

    To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

    Education
    5
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    6
    Columbia College

    Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

    Education
    7
    Northeast College of Health Sciences

    Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

    Education
    8
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    9
    Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

    The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

    —
    10
    Minnesota Private College Council Inc

    The minnesota private college council serves the shared needs of its member colleges and advocates for public policy that meets the educational needs of students, enhances private higher education, and strengthens minnesota's economic and…

    Education
    11
    Marietta College

    Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

    Education
    12
    Westminster College

    The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beloit College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND: $396,758 · EducationMINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUNDMINNDEPENDENT: $178,859 · EducationMINNDEPENDENTDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $103,323 · EducationDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY+2 more: $25,610 · EducationTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $454,618 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATIONGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $103,323 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAYMN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL FORUM: $217,899 · OtherMN INDEPENDENT SCH…JONES HARRISON HOME: $45,430 · OtherJONES HARRISON HOM…+1 more: $7,452 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $103,323 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERI…JONES-HARRISON RESIDENCE: $57,893 · Human ServicesJONES-HARR…
    Education$704,550Philanthropy$557,941Other$270,781Human Services$161,216

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $454,618 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND: $396,758 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetMINNDEPENDENT: $178,859 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $103,323 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $103,323 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION: $103,323 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJONES-HARRISON RESIDENCE: $57,893 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $16,531 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $9,079 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND ↗
    • Who funds MINNDEPENDENT ↗
    • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
    • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
    • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds JONES-HARRISON RESIDENCE ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Helen Harrington Charitable Tr Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen Harrington Charitable Tr Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Helen Harrington Charitable Tr Uw’s filings →

      More from the funding graph