Skip to content
Heinemann-Wallace Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Heinemann-Wallace Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$21kEducation$19kArts & Culture$18kRecreation & Sports$1kFood & Nutrition$500Human Services$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE$15,000
LOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EL SOL JUPITERS NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 5 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$64k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+19%

Still filing today

80%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +58%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +119%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • EF
    ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +3%
  • EP
    ELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +4%
  • LA
    LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Jacksonville University

Our mission is to empower students for life-long growth as global citizens through a transformative, innovative educational experience, built on excellence in community-centered service. We accomplish this mission in a small,…

Education
5
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education
6
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maltz Jupiter Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $17,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INCLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INCLOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationLOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIO…Individual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…BROWN UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCATION: $1,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY ALUM…El Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $500 · OtherFeeding America: $500 · Other+2 more: $300 · OtherJupiter Medical Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthJupiter Medical C…ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FO…Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical…BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Community ImprovementELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$18,000Education$16,000Other$13,300Health$11,000Philanthropy$10,000Community Improvement$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD GOLF CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heinemann-Wallace Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heinemann-Wallace Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heinemann-Wallace Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home