· Private foundation
Heavensent Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION | $89,500 |
| CAMILLUS HOUSE | $20,000 |
| RESCUE ROCK INC | $12,378 |
| LOS ANGELES VIRTUOSI ORCHESTRA | $12,000 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| Veronica Sencion Foundation | $10,000 |
| WE ARE LAUREL CANYON | $6,000 |
| EXPEDIENTE ROJO PROJECT INC | $6,000 |
| ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTE OF AMERI | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 70% of grant dollars ($2.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($965k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 30% of all-years giving ($965k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OIORITEL INC7× · 2017–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +65% · 97% of their budget
- NVNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2024 · $144k · revenue +96%
- CHCAMILLUS HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +104%
Funded once
ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $109k · revenue -6%- ECEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $88k · revenue +70%
- MSMANETTE SHREM MUSEUM PARTNERSone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support young american musicians and promote classical music among general audiences.
The venezuelan american endowment for the arts mission is to promote through the visual and performing arts a deeper and richer understanding by venezualan citizens of u. s. culture, and by u.s. citizens of venezualan culture. it is also…
The ojai music festival serves as a creative music laboratory for pioneering new works,championing adventurous programming, and working with today's emerging artists with events during the year and the ojai music festival serves as a…
Creativity encourages focus, discipline, respect, and imagination -- values that make us better global citizens and promote social justice. we believe that music transcends differences and encourages individual empowerment and social…
The latin grammy cultural foundation, through scholarships, fellowships, grants and education programs, furthers international awareness and appreciation of the significant contributions of latin music and its makers to the world's culture.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edward Charles Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Isabel Allende Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORITEL INC ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMILLUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES VIRTUOSI ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Central Coast Wine Classic ↗
- Who funds VAHAGN SETIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ISABEL ALLENDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heavensent Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.