Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heartland Bank Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$183kHealth$59kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$22kRecreation & Sports$14kPublic Benefit$11kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARFIELD COUNTY FRONTIER FAIR ASSOCIATION$37,500
BREMER CENTER$5,000
HAMPTON VETERANS MEMORIAL$5,000
YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA$5,000
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
CALAMUS AREA COMMUNITY FUND$5,000
HASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
AMHERST PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,500
HPS FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAMPTON VETERANS MEMORIAL: $5k → 8%BAILEY HOLTMEIER: $3k → 9%FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $8k → 9%JAEDYN HAJEK: $2k → 10%JAALA STEWART: $2k → 11%RYLIE BRUHA: $2k → 11%AARON MICK: $2k → 11%ALLISON HANEY: $2k → 12%JAELIN WOLFINGER: $2k → 12%GARFIELD COUNTY FRONTIER FAIR ASSOCIATION: $38k → 12%NATALIE VAVRA: $2k → 13%AMHERST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%EMMA ELLIS-SACK: $2k → 16%BAILEY HOLTMEIER: $2k → 9%FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $8k → 9%DAVID MCCOWN: $2k → 10%SHAYSAH BURKHARD: $2k → 11%CALAMUS AREA COMMUNITY FUND: $5k → 12%ADAM KNAPP: $2k → 13%AMHERST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%GENEVA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $8k → 9%KENZIE STREIN: $2k → 11%YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $5k → 11%CALAH ARCHIBEQUE: $2k → 12%AMHERST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%FCF - VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK: $5k → 9%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC DBA JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH & LIFE: $13k → 11%HASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MILES SUGHROUE: $2k → 13%KALLI HEAD: $2k → 9%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC DBA JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH & LIFE: $13k → 11%YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $5k → 11%KEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 8%LAUREN GOODWIN: $2k → 9%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC DBA JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH & LIFE: $13k → 11%HASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%BREMER CENTER: $5k → 8%BAILEY HAFER: $2k → 9%FAIRBURY CIVIC FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $5k → 11%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%ALEXANDER JOHNSON: $2k → 9%FAIRBURY CIVIC FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $5k → 11%HPS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%HPS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 30 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
32

Total granted

$156k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+3%

Still filing today

7%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +28%
  • YO
    YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k
  • FC
    FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k

Funded once

  • GP
    GENEVA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • FV
    FCF - VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • KP
    KEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Community Foundation Inc

The harvard community foundation is dedicated to the future by encouraging donations for social, cultural, and educational progress in harvard, nebraska.

Philanthropy
2
Jefferson Community Foundation

Jcf connects people, ideas, and resources to build a future of opportunity for all in jefferson county.

Philanthropy
3
Harrison Chamber Foundation Inc

To support, foster, and protect the harrison regional chamber of commerce mission

—
4
Hamilton Community Foundation

The foundation receives contributions from donors in the community and then through the above gifts and grants enriches the community through strategic grant making in the fields of the arts, education, housing, social services, civic…

Philanthropy
5
The Fairfield Community Foundation

To solicit, invest, and disburse funds as grants and scholarships for the educational, charitable, artistic, social and civic benefit of the citizens in the surrounding community.

—
6
Central Adirondack Partnership for the 21ST Century Inc

Forum for community concerns

Community Improvement
7
Hamilton County Fair Foundation

Charitable and educational support for the hamilton county exposition in hamilton county iowa

Recreation & Sports
8
Harper County Health Foundation

Support and promote overall health and wellness within the Harper County, Kansas, area and surrounding communities

Health
9
Columbus Community Foundation

Management of funds to benefit the local community

Philanthropy
10
Kenosha Community Foundation

We lead, serve and collaborate with donors to create enduring philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
Fairfield Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote local businesses and business development in fairfield, iowa

—
12
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hastings Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fairbury Civic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA: $20,000 · OtherYMCA OF HASTINGS NEBRASKAFILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $16,666 · OtherFILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITALFAIRBURY CIVIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherGENEVA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $7,500 · OtherAMHERST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7,500 · Other+75 more: $159,669 · Other+75 moreGARFIELD COUNTY FRONTIER FAIR ASSOC: $37,500 · EducationGARFIELD COUNTY…CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationCENTRAL COMMUNI…SHICKLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,667 · EducationJEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $37,500 · HealthJEFFERSON COM…HASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$221,335Education$44,167Health$37,500Philanthropy$15,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARFIELD COUNTY FRONTIER FAIR ASSOC: $37,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRBURY CIVIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetKEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAMILTON RECREATION INC: $1,169 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARFIELD COUNTY FRONTIER FAIR ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRBURY CIVIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KEARNEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wortman Family Charitable TrustNE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wortman Family Charitable Trust · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heartland Bank Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heartland Bank Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heartland Bank Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Heartland Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heartland Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph