Skip to content
Health Careers Futures at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Health Careers Futures

Primary exempt purpose - to ensure the future of southwestern pennsylvania's health care industry and to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to attract, support, and retain healthcare workers

$970k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$276k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.3MHousing & Shelter$719kHuman Services$400kHealth$208k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $620k
  • $250k+1 grant · $276k
$80,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$724k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$276,002
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF NURSING$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$100,000
CENTRE CARE$80,000
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING$80,000
UPMC CANTERBURY PLACE$80,000
PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION$80,000
THE SOCIETY FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICINE$33,900
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION NURSING SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION$20,000
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOC OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING: $120k → 10%WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING: $80k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION: $120k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION: $80k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 11 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $576k · revenue +11%
  • CP
    CANTERBURY PLACE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CENTRE CARE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LI
    LEADINGAGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $44k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian SeniorCare at Home Inc

The Organization provides in-home medical services for older or disabled adults to meet health/security needs. Through its Medicare certified Home Health Agency, Presbyterian SeniorCare at Home provides skilled nursing, physical and…

Health
2
Longwood at Oakmont Inc

Continuing care retirement community providing a full range of quality amenities & support including an accredited LifeCare model that provides priority access to future healthcare services.

Human Services
3
Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

Health
4
The Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

—
5
Presbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie

To be a compassionate, inclusive faith-inspired network of communities and services committed to enhancing the quality of life of older adults.Presbyterian Homes is a part of the Presbyterian SeniorCare network of facilities.

—
6
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
7
Leadingage Pa

Leadingage pa's mission statement is to promote the interests of its members by enhancing their ability to provide quality services efficiently and effectively; and by representing the members through cooperative action.

Community Improvement
8
McDonald Presbyterian Senior Housing in

HUD subsidized affordable housing with supportive services for low income seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the HUD 202 Section 8 program.SeniorCare Network manages this community and provides or assists in the…

Housing & Shelter
9
Presbyterian Retirement Communities Northwest

A faith-based non-profit organization that support communities and services committed to improving the lives of older adults by integrating housing, community services, technology, philanthropy, and partnerships.

Human Services
10
Upmc Senior Communities Inc

Independent and assisted senior congregate living (see schedule o)

Health
11
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health
12
Wesley Commons

Wesley commons is a continuing care retirement community that provides value-based health services, including assisted living, intermediate and skilled nursing care, specialized care for alzheimer's and dementia-related illnesses, as well…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evangelical Services for the Aging; the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian SeniorCare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $576,202 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $300,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLV…CANTERBURY PLACE: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterCANTERBURY PLACECENTRE CARE INC: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRE CARE INCPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundat…LEADINGAGE INC: $43,600 · Housing & ShelterLEADINGAGE INCPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UN…POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $67,800 · OtherPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-T…PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION: $40,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIAT…P H E N S INC: $40,000 · OtherP H E N S INCMARTINS RUN: $200,000 · Human ServicesMARTINS RUNPresbyterian SeniorCare: $200,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Seni…EVANGELICAL SERVICES FOR THE AGING: $100,000 · Health
Education$876,202Housing & Shelter$718,600Other$497,800Human Services$400,000Health$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $576,202 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANTERBURY PLACE: $300,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRE CARE INC: $300,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMARTINS RUN: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare: $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEVANGELICAL SERVICES FOR THE AGING: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $67,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLEADINGAGE INC: $43,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION: $40,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Health Careers Futures funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Health Careers Futures. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health Careers Futures’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home