Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Health Careers Futures

Primary exempt purpose - to ensure the future of southwestern pennsylvania's health care industry and to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to attract, support, and retain healthcare workers

$970k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$276k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$1.3MHousing & Shelter$719kHuman Services$400kHealth$208k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $620k
  • $250k+1 grant · $276k
$80,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$724k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$276,002
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF NURSING$100,000
PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION$80,000
CENTRE CARE$80,000
UPMC CANTERBURY PLACE$80,000
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING$80,000
THE SOCIETY FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICINE$33,900
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOC OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION$20,000
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION NURSING SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING: $120k → 10%WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING: $80k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION: $120k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE FOUNDATION: $80k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 11 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $576k · revenue +11%
  • CP
    CANTERBURY PLACE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CENTRE CARE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LI
    LEADINGAGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $44k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

Health
2
Longwood at Oakmont Inc

Continuing care retirement community providing a full range of quality amenities & support including an accredited LifeCare model that provides priority access to future healthcare services.

Human Services
3
Presbyterian SeniorCare at Home Inc

The Organization provides in-home medical services for older or disabled adults to meet health/security needs. Through its Medicare certified Home Health Agency, Presbyterian SeniorCare at Home provides skilled nursing, physical and…

Health
4
The Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

5
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
6
Presbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie

To be a compassionate, inclusive faith-inspired network of communities and services committed to enhancing the quality of life of older adults.Presbyterian Homes is a part of the Presbyterian SeniorCare network of facilities.

7
Pittsburgh Lifetime Care Community

Continuing care retirement community fostering physical and financial security to seniors through independent living, personal care, memory care and skilled nursing care facilities.

Human Services
8
Upmc Senior Communities Inc

Independent and assisted senior congregate living (see schedule o)

Health
9
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
10
The Green Home

Skilled nursing facility.

11
Leadingage Pa

Leadingage pa's mission statement is to promote the interests of its members by enhancing their ability to provide quality services efficiently and effectively; and by representing the members through cooperative action.

Community Improvement
12
Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare

Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare is a Christian non-profit continuing care retirement community providing nursing care, personal care, and independent housing for the elderly, in a quality dignified living environment. The residents are…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $576,202 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $300,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLV…CANTERBURY PLACE — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterCANTERBURY PLACECENTRE CARE INC — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRE CARE INCPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundat…LEADINGAGE INC — $43,600 · Housing & ShelterLEADINGAGE INCPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $350,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UN…POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $67,800 · OtherPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-T…PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION — $40,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIAT…P H E N S INC — $40,000 · OtherP H E N S INCMARTINS RUN — $200,000 · Human ServicesMARTINS RUNPresbyterian SeniorCare — $200,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Seni…EVANGELICAL SERVICES FOR THE AGING — $100,000 · Health
Education$876,202Housing & Shelter$718,600Other$497,800Human Services$400,000Health$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $576,202 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANTERBURY PLACE — $300,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRE CARE INC — $300,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMARTINS RUN — $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEVANGELICAL SERVICES FOR THE AGING — $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation — $75,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $67,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLEADINGAGE INC — $43,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION — $40,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Health Careers Futures funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph