Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Heagerty Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$270kEducation$219kRecreation & Sports$131kHealth$81kHuman Services$17kYouth Development$15kReligion$9kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION$150,000
MARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION$10,000
GARRETT DUNSMOOR MEMORIALFOUNDATION$5,000
ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS$4,000
Individual grant recipient$1,175
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$716k · 11 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$716k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+48%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +171%
  • GD
    GARRETT DUNSMOOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +65%
  • AO
    ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS
    3× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SP
    ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lillie Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Caitlin Duffy Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Smh Case Management Inc

SMH Case Management, Inc. helps patients and families navigate the challenges of caring for a loved one at home by assisting families in accessing a full range of resources and programs within the community. Skilled case managers…

Health
4
Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.

Human Services
5
Luella Hannan Memorial Foundation
6
Dominique Dalessio Memorial Fund Inc
Community Improvement
7
Little Heroes League

Little Heroes League helps babies born with multiple health challenges achieve their best life outcomes by providing early life care coordination that begins as early as birth and continues through hospital discharge while at home.…

Philanthropy
8
The Marty Lyons Foundation Inc

The Marty Lyons Foundation fulfills the special wishes of children who have a terminal or life threatening illness.

Health
9
Ronald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc

Our Mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

10
Miracle of the Hudson

To provide support services for families with children with rare diseases.

Health
11
Mcnish Family Foundation
Philanthropy
12
H&L Macklowe Family Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Carleigh Mac Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST ANTHONY'S SCHOOL — $211,250 · OtherST ANTHONY'S SCHOOLOSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $120,855 · OtherOSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE INC+10 more — $50,835 · Other+10 moreCOMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION — $207,500 · PhilanthropyCOMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATIONMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION — $70,000 · PhilanthropyMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATIONTHE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC — $62,250 · PhilanthropyTHE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INCGARRETT DUNSMOOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHAITI EDUCATION and RESOURCE TEAM INC (HEART) — $3,500 · EducationHALESITE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$382,940Philanthropy$339,750Youth Development$15,000Human Services$10,000Education$3,500Public Safety & Disaster$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION — $207,500 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetOSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $120,855 over 4y, 19% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC — $62,250 over 6y, 12% of budgetGARRETT DUNSMOOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS — $9,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALESITE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPANIONS IN COURAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OSWEGO LITTLE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds MARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CARLEIGH MAC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GARRETT DUNSMOOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS
  • Who funds HAITI EDUCATION and RESOURCE TEAM INC (HEART)
  • Who funds My Sisters Place Inc
  • Who funds HALESITE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heagerty Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heagerty Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Heagerty Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph