Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hck Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
5
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of Hck Charitable Foundation Trust’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Combined Jewish Philanthropies Of Greater Boston Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Hck Charitable Foundation Trust named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $72k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
17
4
18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$150kEducation$30kReligion$15kSocial Science$13kHealth$8kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$5kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k11 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$11,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$10,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$10,000
THE WINCHENDON SCHOOL$5,000
RIVERDALE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$5,000
CONGREGATION MISHKAN TEFILA$5,000
CARNEGIE HALL$3,000
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$3,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$2,500
ASPCA - NYC GROUP$1,000
NORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE USA$1,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000
VASSAR COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONGREGATION MISHKAN TEFILA: $5k → 7%SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGE: $3k → 8%THE WINCHENDON SCHOOL: $5k → 11%NORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM: $1k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1k → 14%VASSAR COLLEGE: $1k → 9%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $10k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE USA: $1k → 14%RIVERDALE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $5k → 8%THE WINCHENDON SCHOOL: $5k → 11%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%CARNEGIE HALL: $3k → 17%BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS: $12k → 8%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%ASPCA - NYC GROUP: $1k → 17%BUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS: $3k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 16%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $3k → 17%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 16%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $150k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46k · 4 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$46k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+35%

Still filing today

75%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +110%
  • TW
    THE WINCHENDON SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CS
    CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $150,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLCENTRAL SYNAGOGUE — $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUEJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'…RIVERDALE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherRIVERDALE COUNTRY DAY SCH…CONGREGATION MISHKAN TEFILA — $5,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MISHKAN TEFI…SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGE — $2,500 · Other+3 more — $3,000 · Other+3 moreNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $13,500 · EducationNORTHEASTER…THE WINCHENDON SCHOOL INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE WINCHEN…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,000 · EducationBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $7,500 · HealthMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureNORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$150,000Other$55,000Education$24,500Health$7,500Arts & Culture$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINCHENDON SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hck Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc1% of income from government
  • Norman Rockwell Museum at Stockbridge Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hck Charitable Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Hck Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph