Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hawkins Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$41kHousing & Shelter$22kArts & Culture$14kHuman Services$11kEducation$9kYouth Development$7kHealth$4kCivil Rights$659Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,121
Median grant
3
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$6,352
FRIENDSHIP APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION$2,242
FERRUM COLLEGE$1,121
THREE OAKS FELLOWSHIP UMC$1,121
WOODLAWN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,121
MASONIC HOME OF VIRGINIA$1,121
SHRINERS HOSP CHILDREN TRUST$1,121
THE MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$1,121
Individual grant recipient$934
ARCH ROANOKE$747
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $747 → 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $703 → 11%VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES: $879 → 9%VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $824 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$126k
$6k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2019–2023 · $29k
  • GU
    GENESIS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k
  • HC
    HUNTINGTON CRT UNTD MTHDST CHRCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k

Funded once

  • TO
    THREE OAKS UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • BU
    BELMONT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $989
  • VU
    VIRGINA UNITED METHODIST HOMES
    one grant, 2023 · $879
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reformed Church Ministries to the Aging the Particular Synod of Mid-Atlantics

The mission of the reformed church ministries to the aging, the regional synod of the mid-atlantics ("rch"), is "committed to the compassionate care of our elders in a spiritual environment". our commission and priority is to serve the…

Human Services
2
The Nebraska Masonic Home

The nebraska masonic home provides independent living, assisted living and nursing care to masons and their direct female relatives.

—
3
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
7
Glacier Hills Inc

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence in our communities.glacier hills is a member of the trinity senior living communities…

Human Services
8
Lutheran Village At Miller's Grant

The lutheran village at miller's grant is organized to receive and administer funds for, to establish, maintain, supervise, coordinate, assist and perform planning and other functions for the benefit of, or to carry out the charitable,…

Housing & Shelter
9
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Masonic Home for Children At Oxford Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ferrum College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,143 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGENESIS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12,704 · OtherGENESIS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHUNTINGTON CRT UNTD MTHDST CHRCH: $11,956 · OtherHUNTINGTON CRT UNTD MTHDST CHRCHFRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGE: $10,286 · OtherFRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT VILLAGEWOODLAWN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $9,495 · OtherWOODLAWN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHREE OAKS FELLOWSHIP UMC: $7,385 · OtherTHREE OAKS FELLOWSHIP UMCFRIENDSHIP MANOR APT VILLAGE CRP: $6,462 · OtherFRIENDSHIP MANOR APT VILLAGE CRPSHRINERS HOSP CHILDREN TRUST: $5,407 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,329 · Other+9 more: $7,866 · Other+9 moreThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $9,495 · EducationThe Moody Bibl…FERRUM COLLEGE: $9,495 · EducationFERRUM COLLEGEMASONIC HOME OF VIRGINIA: $9,495 · HealthMASONIC HO…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4,088 · HealthTHE SHRINE…VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $1,703 · Human ServicesTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $1,450 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION: $2,242 · Housing & Shelter
Other$106,033Education$18,990Health$13,583Human Services$3,153Housing & Shelter$2,242

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $9,495 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMASONIC HOME OF VIRGINIA: $9,495 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFERRUM COLLEGE: $9,495 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4,088 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION: $2,242 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $1,703 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $1,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MASONIC HOME OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds FERRUM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP APARTMENT VILLAGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCH SERVICES DBA ARCH/TRUST HOUSE/BETHANY HALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hawkins Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hawkins Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hawkins Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph