Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hasselhofer-Wolf Schlrshp Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$120kEducation$65k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$120,218
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER CLAVER CHURCH$120,218
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST PETER CLAVER CHURCH: $120k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 7 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$41k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

43%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON
    5× · 2017–2023 · $13k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $9k
  • MU
    Marquette University
    3× · 2018–2021 · $7k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • ND
    NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • LU
    LAKELAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
10
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
11
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marian University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETER CLAVER CHURCH: $120,218 · OtherST PETER CLAVER CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $12,802 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE: $8,665 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SHEBOYGAN: $5,713 · Other+12 more: $19,598 · Other+12 moreMarquette University: $6,589 · EducationMarquette U…CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $2,760 · EducationCARROLL UNI…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $2,210 · EducationCONCORDIA U…LAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $2,180 · EducationLAKELAND UN…MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $1,850 · EducationMARIAN UNIV…VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $1,252 · EducationVITERBO UNI…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $1,120 · EducationMILWAUKEE S…+1 more: $522 · Education
Other$166,996Education$18,483

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $6,589 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $2,760 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $2,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $2,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $1,252 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $522 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Holt Family Scholarship FdnIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Holt Family Scholarship Fdn · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hasselhofer-Wolf Schlrshp Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hasselhofer-Wolf Schlrshp Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hasselhofer-Wolf Schlrshp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph