Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harvey L Young Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2020
18
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

86% of Harvey L Young Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Harvey L Young Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $26k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
11
’19
8
’20
3
’21
6
’22
4
’23
4
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$55kEducation$47kAnimals$43kHuman Services$17kHealth$2kRecreation & Sports$2kScience & Tech$500Other$0
02FY2020 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$5,000
FIDELITY INV CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$5,000
ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER$3,000
EMIT AT FOREST HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
MIAMI DADE ANIMAL SERVICES$2,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI$1,000
THE CORNERSTONE SCHOOL$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$500
Individual grant recipient$500
STETSON UNIVERSITY FUND$500
STETSON UNIVERSITY FUND$500
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$500
STETSON UNIVERSITY FUND$500
STETSON UNIVERSITY FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $4k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $2k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $2k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $500 → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
VA
DE
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 15 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$84k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CORNERSTONE SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +144%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    3× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • BC
    BROOKLYN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • FH
    FOREST HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
10
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
11
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITHFUL FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $25,510 · OtherFAITHFUL FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYBROOKLYN COLLEGE: $20,000 · OtherBROOKLYN COLLEGEADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER: $8,000 · OtherADRIENNE ARSHT CENTERFIDELITY INV CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $7,800 · OtherFIDELITY INV CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDMIAMI DADE ANIMAL SERVICES: $7,050 · OtherMIAMI DADE ANIMAL SERVICESEMIT AT FOREST HIGH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherEMIT AT FOREST HIGH SCHOOLTHE CORNERSTONE SCHOOL INC: $5,620 · OtherTHE CORNERSTONE SCHOOL INC+6 more: $7,180 · Other+6 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $47,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING …MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $2,500 · EducationTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $500 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EducationHumane World for Animals Inc: $4,240 · AnimalsHumane Society of Marion County Inc: $2,100 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $2,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,100 · AnimalsS P C A OF OCALA INC: $500 · AnimalsTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $9,000 · Human ServicesCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,519 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 · HealthOcala Mountain Bike Association Inc: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$87,160Philanthropy$47,000Education$10,000Animals$9,940Human Services$9,000Health$1,719Recreation & Sports$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $47,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNERSTONE SCHOOL INC: $5,620 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $4,240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Marion County Inc: $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,519 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOcala Mountain Bike Association Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC: $680 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvey L Young Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvey L Young Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Humane Society of Marion County Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harvey L Young Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph