Skip to content
Hart Emc Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Hart Emc Foundation Inc

The purpose of the foundation is to accumulate and disburse funds for charitable purposes in the service area of hart emc.

$243k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kHealth$20kReligion$18kFood & Nutrition$14kRecreation & Sports$13kCrime & Legal$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $22,144, the rows itemized in this filing. The $243,363 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $221,219 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOLD SPRINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT$8,594
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,000
SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INC$6,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HARMONY HOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49k · 3 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$49k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-23%
+20%

Still filing today

33%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $21k
  • BS
    BOLD SPRING VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ADVANTAGE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • HC
    Hart County Community Theatre Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +283%
  • OC
    OTHER CHARITBLE ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • GF
    GEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Red Door Food Pantry Inc

The red door food pantry exists to provide food assistance to those experiencing food insecurity in bartow county, georgia.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Share Ministry Co

Community Share's mission is to feed, clothe, and house people in need within the Polk County, GA and surrounding communities.

Housing & Shelter
3
My Fathers Storehouse the Storehouse

To provide food and other basic necessities for those in need in henderson county north carolina.

Human Services
4
Hope House of North Georgia Inc

Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.

Human Services
5
East Grays Harbor County Food Bank

To gather and distribue food to persons in need and to provide information on good nutrition to persons in need.

—
6
HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services
7
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
8
Tobacco Valley Food Pantry

To provide for the economically disadvantaged people in the community.

Human Services
9
Forsyth Cty Veterans Treatment Court Inc
—
10
West Georgia Domestic Violence Shelter Inc

Carroll county emergency shelter strives to serve survivors of domestic violence and their dependents throughout our service area of carroll, coweta, haralson, heard and meriwether counties. it is our mission to provide safe shelter,…

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Promise of Gainesville Florida Inc

Provide food and shelter for the homeless.

Human Services
12
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Georgia Council On Domestic Violence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Elbert County United Methodist Food Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $20,768 · OtherSAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INCBOLD SPRING VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $14,594 · OtherBOLD SPRING VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTFRIENDS OF ADVANTAGE INC: $14,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ADVANTAGE INCHart County Community Theatre Inc: $9,700 · OtherHart County Community Theatre IncOTHER CHARITBLE ORGANIZATIONS: $8,000 · OtherOTHER CHARITBLE ORGANIZATIONSPILOT CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $7,215 · OtherPILOT CLUB INTERNATIONALSACRED HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH HARTWELL INC: $7,000 · OtherSACRED HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC CHURCH HARTWELL INCFRANKLIN COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,750 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INCCOMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICE: $6,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICEFRIENDS OF THE HART COUNTY LIBRARY INC: $6,285 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HART COUNTY LIBRARY INCUNITED METHODIST CHURCH & ITS AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS: $6,188 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCH & ITS AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONSGEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionGEORGIA FO…ELBERT COUNTY UNITED METHODIST FOOD MINISTRY INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionELBERT COU…CAMP TOCCOA AT CURRAHEE INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthRIGHTEOUS ROCK REFUGE INC: $5,700 · Housing & ShelterNORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $5,150 · Crime & LegalHarmony House Child Advocacy Center Inc: $5,100 · Human Services
Other$107,000Food & Nutrition$13,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Health$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,700Crime & Legal$5,150Human Services$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF ADVANTAGE INC: $14,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetGEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetELBERT COUNTY UNITED METHODIST FOOD MINISTRY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCAMP TOCCOA AT CURRAHEE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRIGHTEOUS ROCK REFUGE INC: $5,700 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $5,150 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHarmony House Child Advocacy Center Inc: $5,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hart Emc Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hart Emc Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hart Emc Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hart Emc Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hart Emc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home