· Private foundation
Harry & Mary Neuman Foundation Trust Dtd 12/29/1992
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of HARRY & MARY NEUMAN FOUNDATION TRUST DTD 12/29/1992’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k27 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $143k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| CONGREGATION SHAAREI TEFILLAH | $18,000 |
| ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| FOREST PARK FOREVER | $10,000 |
| CROWN CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION KINS | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| CHABAD OF GREATER ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS | $10,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HILLEL AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| GANN ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| H F EPSTEIN HEBREW ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| MAIMONIDES SCHOOL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YKYESHIVAT KADIMAH HIGH SCHOOL3× · 2019–2022 · $22k · revenue -34%
- HFH F EPSTEIN HEBREW ACADEMY6× · 2017–2023 · $21k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2019–2022 · $10k
Funded once
- BABais Abraham Congregationone grant, 2018 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.
The primary exempt purpose of the organization is to advocate, teach, and promote the study and practice of orthodox judaism, supervise kosher food production worldwide, provide a beth din court of rabbis for interpretation of jewish law,…
The Jewish Community Relations Council is the public affairs arm of the organized Jewish community, building consensus on issues of concern, and then communicating those interests to policy makers, faith and ethnic communities, civic…
The Jewish Council on Urban Affair's (JCUA) longstanding mission is to combat poverty, racism and antisemitism working in partnership with diverse communities. JCUA uses a community organizing model to engage the Jewish community in the…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.
To further jewish education in israel
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…
To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Yad Yisroel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT KADIMAH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
- Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE CROWN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAUL MIROWITZ JEWISH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TORAH CENTER-MIDWEST INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds YAD YISROEL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF WEST ROGERS PARK ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Millstone Foundation · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Communal Fund · The Heschel J and Adinah W Raskas Family · Louis H Kohler Foundation · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · The Howard Ross Family Foundation · The Patriot Foundation · Charles and M R Shapiro Foundation Inc · Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago · Staenberg Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harry & Mary Neuman Foundation Trust Dtd 12/29/1992 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harry & Mary Neuman Foundation Trust Dtd 12/29/1992?
Find your warmest path to Harry & Mary Neuman Foundation Trust Dtd 12/29/1992 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.