Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harrison Winslow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$28kAnimals$18kHuman Services$17kCivil Rights$10kReligion$8kFood & Nutrition$8kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$287k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GULF COAST$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS$5,000
FORT WORTH CENTRAL OFFICE$2,500
GRACE$2,500
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$2,500
SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%SAFE HAVEN TARRANT COUNTY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 7 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$78k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+30%

Still filing today

71%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +40%
  • FW
    Fort Worth Central Office
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +10%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • EW
    ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • OL
    OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
2
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
3
Texas Legal Services Center Inc

Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

Crime & Legal
4
Texas Defender Service

See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…

Civil Rights
5
Texas Riogrande Public Defender

In rural counties with limited resources, Texas Rio Grande Public Defender delivers free, top-tier legal representation to indigent clients. Our diverse network of skilled advocates collaborates to defend the disadvantaged and protect…

Human Services
6
Planned Parenthood South Texas

The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…

Health
7
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Inc

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas creates healthier communities by providing primary and reproductive healthcare services, delivering science-based education programs, and serving as a strong advocate for reproductive justice in Texas.…

Health
9
Prevent Blindness Texas

to prevent blindness and preserve sight through education, certified vision screening and training, advocacy, research and community and patient service programs

—
10
Eqtx Equality Texas dba Equality Texas

EQTX Equality Texas dba Equality Texas works to secure full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Texans through political action, education, community organizing, and collaboration.

—
11
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
12
Planned Parenthood San Antonio

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved populations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fort Worth Central Office. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE: $10,000 · OtherGRACEFort Worth Central Office: $7,500 · OtherFort Worth Central OfficeTarrant Area Food Bank: $7,500 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION ARLINGTON INC: $6,667 · OtherMISSION ARLINGTON INCOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $5,000 · OtherOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INCFORT WORTH CENTRAL OFFIVE AA: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,667 · OtherPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $17,500 · HealthPlanned Parenthoo…Humane Society of North Texas: $12,500 · AnimalsHumane Society of…ANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $5,000 · AnimalsANIMAL DEFENSE LE…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $16,667 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TAR…ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 · EnvironmentACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$50,334Health$17,500Animals$17,500Human Services$16,667Environment$5,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $16,667 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFort Worth Central Office: $7,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harrison Winslow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harrison Winslow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harrison Winslow Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harrison Winslow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harrison Winslow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph