Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold H Pratt and Marjorie L Pratt Memorial Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of HAROLD H PRATT AND MARJORIE L PRATT MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$13,911
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100$41,732
BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA$27,821
AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY$13,911
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$13,911
BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA$13,911
BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB$13,911
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS$13,910
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 30% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $15k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $15k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $45k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $15k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $15k → 15%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $14k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $14k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $42k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $14k → 15%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $14k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $14k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $42k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $14k → 15%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $14k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $14k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $41k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $14k → 15%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $14k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $14k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $41k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $14k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $14k → 15%AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $13k → 22%GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $13k → 8%BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100: $40k → 9%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $13k → 14%BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $13k → 15%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 9%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $28k → 9%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $28k → 9%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $27k → 9%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $27k → 9%BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA: $26k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $15k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $14k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $14k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $14k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $14k → 9%BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB: $13k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$835k · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$835k
$0

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +44%
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +10% · 28% of their budget
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +72%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    3/5
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    BELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100 — $250,358 · OtherBELVIDERE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 100BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA — $166,906 · OtherBELVIDERE FAMILY YMCABLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA — $83,453 · OtherBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB — $83,452 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS BELVIDERE LIONS CLUBLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $83,451 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $83,454 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS…AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $83,452 · ReligionAMERICAN BI…
    Other$667,620Youth Development$83,454Religion$83,452

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA — $166,906 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $83,454 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB — $83,452 over 6y, 28% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $83,452 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $83,451 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS
    • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS BELVIDERE LIONS CLUB
    • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
    • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Harold H Pratt and Marjorie L Pratt Memorial Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph