Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold F & Suzanne D Falk Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$142kHealth$64kYouth Development$41kSocial Science$19kCivil Rights$17kReligion$11kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$450k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$15,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
BERNIE'S BOOK BANK$7,500
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$4,000
ACHIEVE TAHOE$4,000
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$3,500
OPEN LANDS$2,500
NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS$2,500
HISTORIC CHRIST CHURCH$2,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$2,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK$2,000
PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS$1,750
LURIE CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$1,000
GREATER ORGANIZATION FOR THE LESS FORTUNATE$1,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $2k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $2k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $2k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $1k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $1k → 8%PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 21 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$330k
$2k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    6× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +41%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    6× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +30%
  • BB
    BERNIE'S BOOK BANK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $39k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $522
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF N LAKE TAHOE
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
3
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Uc Berkeley Center for Executive Education

UC Berkeley Center for Executive Education ("CEE") is a nonprofit public benefit corporation dedicated to promoting and advancing education through its executive education programs for corporate and institutional clients seeking continuing…

Education
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Rush University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOYOLA ACADEMY: $25,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONHISTORIC CHRIST CHURCH: $10,500 · OtherHISTORIC CHRIST CHURCHNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK: $9,000 · OtherNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORKYoung America's Foundation: $8,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationOPENLANDS: $7,500 · OtherOPENLANDSACHIEVE TAHOE: $7,000 · OtherACHIEVE TAHOEAMERICAS FUTURE INC: $6,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $6,000 · OtherGREATER ORGANIZATION FOR THE LESS FORTUNATE: $6,000 · Other+6 more: $11,022 · Other+6 moreMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $75,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $18,000 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOL…Rush University Medical Center: $50,000 · HealthRush University M…BERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $38,500 · Youth DevelopmentBERNIE'S BOOK…Foundation for Economic Education Inc: $18,500 · Social SciencePARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP: $8,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN ANTI-COMMUNISM CRUSADE DBA CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW MINISTRY: $2,000 · InternationalCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Environment
Other$120,022Education$93,000Health$50,000Youth Development$38,500Social Science$18,500Human Services$8,000International$2,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $38,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $18,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPENLANDS: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAS FUTURE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN ANTI-COMMUNISM CRUSADE DBA CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW MINISTRY: $2,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS NFP ↗
  • Who funds OPENLANDS ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ANTI-COMMUNISM CRUSADE DBA CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold F & Suzanne D Falk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold F & Suzanne D Falk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harold F & Suzanne D Falk Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Harold F & Suzanne D Falk Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold F & Suzanne D Falk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph