Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harmon Family Foundation (Fka the Claude Harmon Foundation)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$271kHealth$43kEducation$10kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHousing & Shelter$2kPhilanthropy$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
$6,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH$37,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$6,250
EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$2,200
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JESSE DROEMER: $2k → 8%CHANGE HAPPENS CDC: $2k → 16%AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION: $500 → 7%FORCES UNITED: $2k → 18%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%JUSTIN THOMAS FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $25k → 18%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $5k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $5k → 15%EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $5k → 15%THE EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GOLF TOURNAMENT: $3k → 16%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%THE FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $3k → 15%EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $2k → 15%MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE DONATIONS: $2k → 16%THE FIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE: $2k → 15%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH: $37k → 16%EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH: $19k → 16%THE EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH: $19k → 16%EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $19k → 16%THE EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GOLF TOURNAMENT: $1k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH: $19k → 16%RICE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS: $1k → 16%THE EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GOLF TOURNAMENT: $1k → 16%PARSLEY CHARITY GOLF CLASSIC: $1k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 16%PLAYWORKS: $3k → 16%FIRST TEE OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%FIRST TEE OF HOUSTON: $3k → 16%TODD BLAND: $5k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $26k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $26k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $26k → 16%SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 16%PURPLESTRIDE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$312k · 8 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$312k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+50%

Still filing today

25%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $125k
  • ST
    SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $94k
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue -41%

Funded once

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TJ
    THE JUSTIN THOMAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION — $124,500 · OtherSO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATIONSO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACH — $94,000 · OtherSO TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION - PGA REACHFIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE — $21,000 · OtherFIRST TEE OF LOUISVILLE+16 more — $45,175 · Other+16 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $42,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSI…EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $8,760 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $500 · Recreation & SportsTHE JUSTIN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $250 · PhilanthropyCHANGE HAPPENS CDC — $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$284,675Health$42,500Recreation & Sports$9,260Philanthropy$4,250Housing & Shelter$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $42,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORCESUNITED INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDDIE BURKE SR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JUSTIN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FORCESUNITED INC
  • Who funds CHANGE HAPPENS CDC
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harmon Family Foundation (Fka the Claude Harmon Foundation) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph